[EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted us to know:
>Why wouldn't you want to scan your home directory for virii? Or scan your
>Windows files over an SMB mount from your Linux box? Or ...
I guess I'm just one of the lucky few who doesn't have to mess with
Windows (except when one of my tenants screws up her Win
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:17:11AM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Nigel Horne wanted us to know:
> >On Monday 15 Nov 2004 13:49, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >> FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
> >Mind you, they don't include clam in their distro either, which is
> >surprising.
> I
Nigel Horne wanted us to know:
>On Monday 15 Nov 2004 13:49, Nigel Horne wrote:
>> FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
>Mind you, they don't include clam in their distro either, which is surprising.
I thought that Fedora was aimed for the desktop more than the server,
and
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 16:38, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:28:51 +
> Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I thought that as well. I wondered if that would be different if
> > there was a Gnome Clam scanner something else thats on my TODO
> > list, which just seems to ge
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:28:51 +
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I thought that as well. I wondered if that would be different if
> there was a Gnome Clam scanner something else thats on my TODO
> list, which just seems to get bigger all the time.
Take a look at:
http://wolfpack.twu
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 16:27, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Monday 15 Nov 2004 13:49, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
>
> Mind you, they don't include clam in their distro either, which is surprising.
>
Yes, I thought that as well. I wondered if that w
On Monday 15 Nov 2004 13:49, Nigel Horne wrote:
> FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
Mind you, they don't include clam in their distro either, which is surprising.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 13:49 +, Nigel Horne wrote:
> FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
ditto for Mandrake 10.1
I think that might change if the zlib team would update
http://www.gzip.org/zlib which is described as the "canonical URL" ...
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE
FC3 ships with 1.2.1, and RH have yet to issue an update...
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
Does this relate to any of the FreeBSD ports?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=zlib&stype=all
Or is this a core OS thing? I haven't seen a security release from the
FreeBSD team on this one yet...
Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 12:26:27 +
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We must be drastic in this case and the actual version will refuse
> > to build with 1.2.0 and 1.2.1.
>
> The problem with that is that a number of vendors have issued fixed
> versions of 1.2.1 for their systems.
I'm aware of
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 12:22, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:41:09 +
> Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 03 Nov 2004 14:32, Trog wrote:
> > > zlib 1.2.2 is available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.zlib.net/
> > >
> > > this version fixes the known zlib stabilit
zlib 1.2.2 is available at:
http://www.zlib.net/
this version fixes the known zlib stability issue that Clam can hit in
previous 1.2.x versions.
If your vendor hasn't released an update yet, you may want to do a
manual update.
References:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0
13 matches
Mail list logo
