RE: [Clamav-users] suspicious classification resulting in false postives

2005-09-09 Thread Jason Englander
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MIMEDefang has a "suspicious characters in headers" check. This is unrelated to ClamAV. ...and if you're using File::Scan (http://cpan.perl.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Scan-1.43.tar.gz), that also can report things as suspicious. Jason -

RE: [Clamav-users] suspicious classification resulting in false postives

2005-09-09 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Chris Gauch wrote: > We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) > and MIMEDefang (2.53) > our logs indicate that over 86 attachments have been > flagged as "suspicious" by ClamAV 0.86.2 over the past couple of > days. We're beginning to wonder how many of those "suspicio

Re: [Clamav-users] suspicious classification resulting in false postives

2005-09-09 Thread Trog
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 11:24 -0400, Chris Gauch wrote: > We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) and > MIMEDefang (2.53) gateway filtering environment and have seen an increase in > false positives over the past several weeks. Most client complaints have > been specifi

[Clamav-users] suspicious classification resulting in false postives

2005-09-09 Thread Chris Gauch
We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) and MIMEDefang (2.53) gateway filtering environment and have seen an increase in false positives over the past several weeks. Most client complaints have been specifically geared toward not received Microsoft Excel attachments,