On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 11:24 -0400, Chris Gauch wrote: > We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) and > MIMEDefang (2.53) gateway filtering environment and have seen an increase in > false positives over the past several weeks. Most client complaints have > been specifically geared toward not received Microsoft Excel attachments, > when attached directly (in raw format, uncompressed, not zipped by WinZip). > We're up to the latest virusdb, 1073, and our logs indicate that over 86 > attachments have been flagged as "suspicious" by ClamAV 0.86.2 over the past > couple of days. We're beginning to wonder how many of those "suspicious" > attachments were actually legit Microsoft documents. Any insight or > investigation into this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
ClamaAV doesn't classify things as "suspicious". I suggest you look at the other software you are using. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
