Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-06 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:55:29 -0400 Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>this segmentation fault that occurred at the exact second it scanned > > > >>this Klez virus? > > > > > > As a temporary work-around please disable the LogSyslog directive. > > The format string problem is connected

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Conn
this segmentation fault that occurred at the exact second it scanned this Klez virus? As a temporary work-around please disable the LogSyslog directive. The format string problem is connected with the vsyslog() call in shared/output.c and currently I have no (good) idea how to fix it. Hello, I

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 05 May 2004 09:32:48 -0400 Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This server processes between 30 and 100 thousand emails per day, > calling clamdscan on every one. It will find 2 to 5 hundred Klez > viruses per day. In your expert opinion, what would be the reason for > > this segm

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Conn
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Wed, 05 May 2004 09:32:48 -0400 Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, This server processes between 30 and 100 thousand emails per day, calling clamdscan on every one. It will find 2 to 5 hundred Klez viruses per day. In your expert opinion, what would be the r

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 05 May 2004 09:32:48 -0400 Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > This server processes between 30 and 100 thousand emails per day, > calling clamdscan on every one. It will find 2 to 5 hundred Klez > viruses per day. In your expert opinion, what would be the reason for >

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Conn
No, it isn't "obviously the scan that caused the segmentation fault". That's a wholly unfounded assumption on your part. This server processes between 30 and 100 thousand emails per day, calling clamdscan on every one. It will find 2 to 5 hundred Klez viruses per day. In your expert opinion,

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 14:32, Chris Conn wrote: > Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > > >> Tue May 4 16:08:13 2004 -> Segmentation fault :-( Bye.. > >> > >>and at precisely 16:08:13, MailScanner reports the following virus: > >> > >>May 4 16:08:13 MailScanner[16448]: > >>/var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/1

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Conn
Tomasz Kojm wrote: Tue May 4 16:08:13 2004 -> Segmentation fault :-( Bye.. and at precisely 16:08:13, MailScanner reports the following virus: May 4 16:08:13 MailScanner[16448]: /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/16448/.i44K7gOj020343/%nTips.exe: Worm.Klez.H FOUND Is it possible that a %n in

Re: [Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-05 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 04 May 2004 18:05:19 -0400 Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am running clamav-0.70 with mailscanner (rebuilt the Fedora RPMs on > RHEL3), and I have had for the first time something I have not had in > a very long time; Segmentation fault, :-( Bye.. > > I searched th

[Clamav-users] segmentation fault in 0.70 ?due to filename of infected virus?

2004-05-04 Thread Chris Conn
Hello, I am running clamav-0.70 with mailscanner (rebuilt the Fedora RPMs on RHEL3), and I have had for the first time something I have not had in a very long time; Segmentation fault, :-( Bye.. I searched the logs, and this occurred as follows: Tue May 4 16:08:13 2004 -> Segmentation faul