On Friday 15 Apr 2005 23:46, Carl Thompson wrote:
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 4/15/2005 at 5:49 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> >> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
> >>
> >> On 4/15/2005 at 3:58 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/15/2005 at 5:49 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>>
>> On 4/15/2005 at 3:58 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>> >>
>>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 4/15/2005 at 3:58 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> >On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson wrote:
> >>
> >> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
> >>
> >> On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Okay this is what i have for clamav-
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/15/2005 at 3:58 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson wrote:
>>
>> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>>
>> On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>>
>> >> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote s
On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:58, Nigel Horne wrote:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=,
> T=S:4m;R:4m')dn
(I missed a final l on the cut 'n' paste before the pedantic start winging)
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=,
T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
>
On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson wrote:
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> >> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server
> >
> >Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both?
> >
> >> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 -
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server
>
>Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both?
>
>> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external --server=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>> local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.
> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server
Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both?
> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external --server=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock"
>
> and I have to run clamd on that server so that clamav uses it
> externally to scan
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/14/2005 at 9:14 AM Nigel Horne wrote:
>On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
>
>> I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to
>connect to a remote clamav-milter process:
>>
>> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet
Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a
>> local socket.
>
> Wrong.
*removes foot from mouth* oops, sorry...
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
> I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to connect
> to a remote clamav-milter process:
>
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
>
> and the install doc says to put
>
> CLAMAV_
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:55, Carl Thompson wrote:
> Sendmail must connect to clamav-milter not clamd directly but clamav-milter
> will not listen on a TCP port
Yes it will.
> Carl
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 02:42, Carl Thompson wrote:
> If clamav-milter is nothing but a portal so to speak and doesn't cause much
load thats fine but I thought clamav-milter now has clamd inherant in it (no
longer needing to communicate with clamd).
>
> This would increase the load of clamav-mi
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a local
> socket.
Wrong.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/13/2005 at 5:12 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Carl Thompson wrote:
>> I believe the problem is a hard code issue. The setting --server
>> isn't telling clamav-milter to listen on a specified IP for
>> connections its telling clamav-milter to connect
Carl Thompson wrote:
> I believe the problem is a hard code issue. The setting --server
> isn't telling clamav-milter to listen on a specified IP for
> connections its telling clamav-milter to connect to clamd on the
> specified IP thus making the INSTALL documentation in error (unless
> i'm serio
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/13/2005 at 4:05 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Carl Thompson wrote:
>> I can only get clamd to open port 3311 as a listening TCP socket.
>
>Default is 3310, no? Why can't you open port 3310? Is there something
>else already listening?
>
I believe th
Carl Thompson wrote:
> I can only get clamd to open port 3311 as a listening TCP socket.
Default is 3310, no? Why can't you open port 3310? Is there something else
already listening?
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/13/2005 at 5:49 PM Nigel Horne wrote:
>On Wednesday 13 Apr 2005 17:19, Carl Thompson wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a good walkthru for the new system (clamav-milter
>not requiring clamd) so that I can setup a dedicated server for virus
>scanning?
>
On Wednesday 13 Apr 2005 17:19, Carl Thompson wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good walkthru for the new system (clamav-milter not
> requiring clamd) so that I can setup a dedicated server for virus scanning?
Look in .../clamav-milter/INSTALL
> Thanks
> Carl
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Com
Does anyone know of a good walkthru for the new system (clamav-milter not
requiring clamd) so that I can setup a dedicated server for virus scanning?
Thanks
Carl
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
21 matches
Mail list logo
