*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote: >> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server > >Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both? > >> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external --server=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx >> local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock" >> >> and I have to run clamd on that server so that clamav uses it >> externally to scan for virus (if i understand this correctly) > >I presume by "that server" you mean the server running clamav-milter > >> >> and on my primary server i did the same thing and clamav creates >> local socket and scans thru clamd on remote server. > >I presume by "primary server" you mean the server running clamd, though >I don't understand what you mean by you "did the same thing"? Why would >you do the same on both machines? Surely one runs clamd and one >runs clamav-milter? > >> however if i use >> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl >> (machine name chaned to correct machine of course) > >By "machineb" do you mean the same as "primary server" above? Or the >same as "that server"? > >> I still get socket errors in maillog about attempting to scan and >> clamd is on the remote socket not clamav-milter on the remote socket. > >> I'm sure i'm doing something simple wrong but I sure can't figure it out. > >Sorry, but I can't figure out what you're trying to do and what you've >tried to set up. > >The following scenarios are possible: >1) sendmail, clamav-milter and clamd all on one machine >2) sendmail and clamav-milter on one machine, clamd on another machine >3) sendmail on one machine, clamav-milter and clamd on another machine >4) sendmail, clamav-milter and clamd all on separate machines >5) sendmail and clamav-milter on one machine, clamd running on multiple >machines load balanced >6) sendmail and clamav-milter on separate machines, clamd running on >multiple machines load balanced, which may include the same machines. > >Please be very specific about what you're trying to achieve. I guess >it's either scenario 2 or scenario 3? > >> Carl > I can get scenario 2 to work without a problem and this is how I did it for some time before .82 (when clamd scanning was integrated into clamav-milter and you no longer needed to run clamd just for clamav-milter) The problem I have is scenario 3. machine a has sendmail on it machine b is a low use box so I would like to run clamav-milter and clamd (if its necessary now) on it and have machine a connect to clamav-milter on machine b. however I am unable to get clamav-milter to listen on a TCP port on machine b Carl _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
