On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
> I agree that anti-virus software should look for viruses and either reply
> "virus found" or "virus not found". The latter is not, of course, the same
> as saying "no virus present".
Yes, but in the same way you might get a "Can't open file, no permissi
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 11:26 am, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 11:08 am, peter pilsl wrote:
> > Is there any way to persuade the milter to block password-protected
> > zip-files ?
>
> I do not feel that is the job of anti-virus software.
Indeed. Password-protected zip files
Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Is there any way to persuade the milter to block password-protected
> > zip-files ?
>
> I do not feel that is the job of anti-virus software.
It should be implementation dependant, a security policy may want to
allow only datas parsed by the anti-virus with a "no virus here
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 11:08 am, peter pilsl wrote:
> Is there any way to persuade the milter to block password-protected
> zip-files ?
I do not feel that is the job of anti-virus software.
> peter
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL
when using clamav as milter for sendmail I cannot query the returncode of
clamav. So a password-protected zipfile is passing the milter and from the header
"X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67, clamav-milter version 0.66n" it
looks like the file is clean, while in fact it just could not
