On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:55, McKeever Chris wrote:
> thanks for your reply. Not sure I follow. wouldnt finding it signla a virus and
> then the process that called clamd (in this case
> qmialscanner) take the necessary actions?
I think the original poster has been mis-quoted. I read it as:
Vi
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:21 , Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>McKeever Chris wrote:
>
>> I am running qmail-scanner with clamav (0.65)
>> I have one machine that acts as a gateway, and then sends it to the main email
>> server.
>> The gateway is the one with qmailscanner and clamav, the em
McKeever Chris wrote:
I am running qmail-scanner with clamav (0.65)
I have one machine that acts as a gateway, and then sends it to the main email server.
The gateway is the one with qmailscanner and clamav, the email servers post-MTA (@mail) has a plugin for clamav which scans the file before
da
I am running qmail-scanner with clamav (0.65)
I have one machine that acts as a gateway, and then sends it to the main email server.
The gateway is the one with qmailscanner and clamav, the email servers post-MTA
(@mail) has a plugin for clamav which scans the file before
databsing it.
I have no
