On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:55, McKeever Chris wrote:
> thanks for your reply.  Not sure I follow.  wouldnt finding it signla a virus and 
> then the process that called clamd (in this case 
> qmialscanner) take the necessary actions?

I think the original poster has been mis-quoted. I read it as:

Virus1 -> Q-S -> quarantined
virus1 -> Q-S ->  PASS -> other AV system -> quarantined 

The question being, why does clamd appear to miss the same virus once in
a while.

Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to