On Friday 23 Jan 2004 5:05 pm, OpenMacNews wrote:
> i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend their
> time supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which is no longer supported by Apple
> but, of course, to each their own =)
As I have already said, it has nothing to do with "to each thei
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800
Mark Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install
> clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well,
> as far as I can tell. Tests run fine.
>
> The only issues I've had are freshc
hi,
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend their time supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which i
Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install
clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well, as
far as I can tell. Tests run fine.
The only issues I've had are freshclam's -c flag seems broken:
[dina:/var/log/clamav] engineer% sudo freshclam -d -c 2
Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install
clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well, as
far as I can tell. Tests run fine.
The only issues I've had are freshclam's -c flag seems broken:
[dina:/var/log/clamav] engineer% sudo freshclam -d -c 2
On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:28 AM, OpenMacNews wrote:
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just
offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
I can confirm that it builds find on 10.3.
i can't say i agree w
> > given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just
> > offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
> > on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
>
> I can confirm that it builds fine on 10.3.
As I understand it, Apple fully supported pthreads as of
I got bizarre errors with my last two posts, so here goes again. Sorry
if this double-posts...
On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:28 AM, OpenMacNews wrote:
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just
offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a va
hi,
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi,
0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend their time
supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which i
