On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:28 AM, OpenMacNews wrote:
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
I can confirm that it builds fine on 10.3.
i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend their time supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which is no
longer supported by Apple
i'm sure its tough enough worrying about current OSes ...
Well, certainly I would prefer to be running something more current, but a production server often has to lag behind a version or two due to funding or other reasons. If all it takes is adding 5 lines of code to allow the thing to build on 10.1.x, why not?
0.60 also does not build on 10.1.x without modification, but I've been running it for half a year on 10.1.x with exim and exiscan and it has been flawless. If there is some part of it that is unsupported, I haven't found it.
I'm not asking for someone to put hours of work in, just to add the lines to make it build properly. Now, if someone has a reason why it is potentially disasterous to run clamav on 10.1.x, that would obviously change my opinion.
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
