> Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > Jason Bertoch wrote:
> >> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
> >> freshclam to avoid this error?
> >>
> >> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
> >> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
happens. Just wait a day or so.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >> Jason Bertoch wrote:
> >>> I understand this is harmless,
Brandon Perry wrote:
> His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
> happens. Just wait a day or so.
>
It is even more confused - this is what is in my log:
Local version: 0.94.1 Recommended version: 0.94.2
And this is what is on the clamav home page:
Latest Clam
On Nov 26, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
is my math wrong or is the error message recommending the previous
version ?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
On 2008-11-26 17:47, Brandon Perry wrote:
> His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
> happens. Just wait a day or so.
The TTL on current.cvd.clamav.net needs to expire, if you're using a DNS
cache.
Should not take more than ~15 minutes.
Best regards,
--Edwin
___
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>>> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
>>> freshclam to avoid this error?
>>>
>>> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
>>> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
>> freshclam to avoid this error?
>>
>> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
>> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
>
> It's not
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
> freshclam to avoid this error?
>
> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
It's not an error, it is an advisory to le
I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
freshclam to avoid this error?
freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronet Bro
