> Dennis Peterson wrote: > > Jason Bertoch wrote: > >> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in > >> freshclam to avoid this error? > >> > >> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! > >> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1 > > > > It's not an error, it is an advisory to let you know there is a newer > > version and that you should take the time to discover the importance of > > the new version. If you decide the new version is not critical then you > > can ignore the advisory. If you use syslog-ng for clamav logging you can > > map out those messages.
On 26.11.08 10:37, Rick Macdougall wrote: > Errr, he's running 94.2 and freshclam is telling him that 94.1 is newer. > > I don't think that 94.1 > 94.2 funny, since this bug was reported as fixed: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
