Re: [Clamav-users] dev virus database

2004-08-29 Thread Nigel Horne
On Sunday 29 Aug 2004 20:35, Graham Toal wrote: > > Update to 0.75.1 or CVS. > If we ever > get overloaded however I would turn clamav off first, as it is much more > of a CPU hog than uvscan] You should find the CVS version is better than 0.75.1 in this respect. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arran

Re: [Clamav-users] dev virus database

2004-08-29 Thread Graham Toal
> > I then submitted it to the virus submission page and it stated it was > > already in the dev database and that I should run freshclam. > > Update to 0.75.1 or CVS. Just FYI, I upgraded today from devel-20040630 to 0.75.1 with no trouble. I have been running clamav in parallel with uvscan on m

Re: [Clamav-users] dev virus database

2004-08-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:16:17 -0500 "Carl Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I then submitted it to the virus submission page and it stated it was > already in the dev database and that I should run freshclam. Update to 0.75.1 or CVS. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Clamav-users] dev virus database

2004-08-29 Thread Carl Thompson
I currently run 0.74a without any problems. Today however I recieved a virus attachment in an email that was identified by McAffee as mydoom.o I went and forced an immediate update of my database files and scanned my imap directories and the virus was not identified. I then submitted it to the