Damian Menscher wanted us to know:
>> Wow! We got 2 Gb of mail a day, but mine is always:
>> 24064 clamav 9 0 13260 12M 868 S 0.0 1.7 0:00 0 clamd
>I call Bull.
>2 Gb of mail a day, and clamd hasn't used even a second of CPU time?
>Yeah, right. You're confused.
>My stats for cla
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Alex V. Kovirshin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Graham Dunn wrote:
> > As listed in top:
> >
> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> > 45377 mailnull 37 0 169M 76572K RUN242:58 3.86% 3.86% clamd
> >
> > This ma
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Graham Dunn wrote:
> As listed in top:
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 45377 mailnull 37 0 169M 76572K RUN242:58 3.86% 3.86% clamd
>
> This mail server isn't that busy ... maybe 10k messages / day.
As listed in top:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
45377 mailnull 37 0 169M 76572K RUN242:58 3.86% 3.86% clamd
This mail server isn't that busy ... maybe 10k messages / day.
This is clamav-0.70 from freebsd (4.8-STABLE) ports. Should clamd be
rel
