On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Alex V. Kovirshin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Graham Dunn wrote: > > As listed in top: > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > > 45377 mailnull 37 0 169M 76572K RUN 242:58 3.86% 3.86% clamd > > > > This mail server isn't that busy ... maybe 10k messages / day. > > > > This is clamav-0.70 from freebsd (4.8-STABLE) ports. Should clamd be > > releasing memory after it's finished with it? What will cause clam to > > use and hold that much memory? > > > Wow! We got 2 Gb of mail a day, but mine is always: > > 24064 clamav 9 0 13260 12M 868 S 0.0 1.7 0:00 0 clamd
I call Bull. 2 Gb of mail a day, and clamd hasn't used even a second of CPU time? Yeah, right. You're confused. My stats for clamav-0.70: 1258 clamav 15 0 25028 20M 508 S 0.0 0.5 6:35 3 clamd where clamd has been running since May 17. Damian Menscher -- -=#| Physics Grad Student & SysAdmin @ U Illinois Urbana-Champaign |#=- -=#| 488 LLP, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801 Ofc:(217)333-0038 |#=- -=#| 4602 Beckman, VMIL/MS, Imaging Technology Group:(217)244-3074 |#=- -=#| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Fax:(217)333-9819 |#=- -=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers. |#=- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
