On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
I won't say what's correct or incorrect, because what's correct in Slack
Let me just re-state this part :-)
Here is code for that. Mind checking it on Slackware? Assuming it works
It works
Jason
--
Jason Englander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
394F 7E
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
Assuming the problem really is due to not using a FQDN, this might still be
worth fixing in clamav-milter, since it can affect others (even those with
proper setups) as well. Here is the offending code:
ptr = strstr(privdata->from, me);
if(pt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Jason Englander wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
If you already have it set up properly, please compile/run this program on
your mailserver and tell us what it outputs for your hostname:
This is just a FYI, I don't use clamav-milter, so I don't particularl
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
What is the output of 'hostname' on your computer? I'm guessing it returns
If you already have it set up properly, please compile/run this program on
your mailserver and tell us what it outputs for your hostname:
This is just a FYI, I don't use cl
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, .rp wrote:
I changed the /etc/hosts so that the ip address that is taking the email has
the FQDN , before there was no line for that ip address just for 127.0.0.1
Problem still exists. I compiled and ran the program you listed and it reports
just "net" and not the full name.
I changed the /etc/hosts so that the ip address that is taking the email has
the FQDN , before there was no line for that ip address just for 127.0.0.1
Problem still exists. I compiled and ran the program you listed and it reports
just "net" and not the full name.
I am running Linux net 2.4.20-3
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, .rp wrote:
On 31 May 2005 at 14:14, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005, .rp wrote:
When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting
trapped. Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server?
ClamAV has no bugs, so it must be netzero's fault. ;)
On 31 May 2005 at 14:14, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, .rp wrote:
>
> > When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting
> > trapped. Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server?
>
> ClamAV has no bugs, so it must be netzero's fault. ;)
>
> Seriously, can
On Tue, 31 May 2005, .rp wrote:
When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting trapped.
Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server?
ClamAV has no bugs, so it must be netzero's fault. ;)
Seriously, can you get a packet capture of an incoming message from
there? I st
When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting trapped.
Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
10 matches
Mail list logo
