Sarocet wrote:
The new hostname updates would still have needed the kill signature.
Otherwise, you have the same problem as before, but with a different
hostname.
Someone wasn't reading. The scheme was to remove the original
hostname BEFORE using any updates that would kill the software. At
Simon Hobson wrote:
> If anyone was running an old enough 0.95 version, then their software
> wouldn't have died, they would have seen update errors in their logs,
> and the fix would have been to change just one or two hostnames in
> their freshclam.conf.
The new hostname updates would still hav
On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:22 AM, lists wrote:
Of course I am, hence why I can laugh at myself before others ;)
Jim
If that were really true you would not feel the need to keep seeking
attention for your views, but please, carry on for last word your
posts
are really {yawn} gripping.
Hi, all--
On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Forget it, it's been covered, and you'll never persuade this group of people
> that a) there was any alternative,
You have plenty of alternatives. You can switch to using other AV software
from Norton, McCafee, TrendMicro, Panda, Kas
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 10:57 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:13 AM, lists wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >> lists wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >>>
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > You mean, depl
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:13 AM, lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting,
monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of t
Stephen Gran wrote:
Sigh. I guess you didn't bother to read the part about "third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team". This means updating
the actual edge servers is not trivial. The 'parallel infrastructure'
wasn't referring to deploying new hardware, it was referring to
On 4/24/10 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
It's running software that is EO
Stephen Gran wrote:
> 1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
t
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:56:10AM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson w
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> >
>> >> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
>>
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> lists wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Gran wrote:
> >>
> >>> You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
> >>> pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors ar
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
> > pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
> > servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
> > t
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
that's trivial, or were you just making up a solution without knowing
a
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
> >
> >> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
> >> It's running software that is EOL ? Most definitely
> >>
Chris Knight wrote:
>> 1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
2) Wait a couple of weeks, or even six months
3) Shut down old servers,
4. Orphan *all* previous versions, including the still heavily used, and
valid, 0.95s which were released before the hostnam
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On 4/23/2010 8:02 PM, Chris Knight wrote:
>
>> 1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
>> 2) Wait a couple of weeks, or even six months
>> 3) Shut down old servers,
>
> 4. Orphan *all* previous versions, including
On 4/23/2010 8:02 PM, Chris Knight wrote:
1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
2) Wait a couple of weeks, or even six months
3) Shut down old servers,
4. Orphan *all* previous versions, including the still heavily used, and
valid, 0.95s which were released before
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
>
>> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
>> It's running software that is EOL ? Most definitely
>> And Microsoft have sent it a poison pill ? No they haven't
>
> And is it hi
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
> It's running software that is EOL ? Most definitely
> And Microsoft have sent it a poison pill ? No they haven't
And is it hitting Microsoft's servers for full updates even when it should
only be do
21 matches
Mail list logo
