> It's not a bug nor a known problem. You didn't install/configure ClamAV
> properly.
I did install it properly as there isn't much to do wrong, when
downloading the NSIS-based installer and just click "OK" everywhere.
And I found the "problem". Look at this:
P:\_virii>c:\clamav-devel\bin\clam
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> but NOT by the local copy of clamav running on my machine...and I would
> appreciate some useful comments. Since I started to look into clamav it's
> been a pain in the ass getting some help or finding some proper information
> on known problems/bugs...digging throug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And the problem is, that the virus IS recognised by everything on
> the clamav.net site, but NOT by the local copy of clamav running on
> my machine...and I would appreciate some useful comments.
Ok... What version of Clam are you running?
G
On 16/08/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And the problem is, that the virus IS recognised by everything on the
> clamav.net site, but NOT by the local copy of clamav running on my
> machine...and I would appreciate some useful comments. Since I started to
> look into clamav
>When you subscribed to this ml, you visited
>href="http://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users";>http://lists.clama
>v.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users for sure. Now,
>what part of:
>
>- - -
>Subscribe to this ML if you need support for ClamAV.
>
>DO NOT SEND VIRUS SAMPLES HERE!!! NOT
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> >Usually, they say it's not a good thing...
>
> Sorry, but I rather put it online then sending it into a mailing-list.
When you subscribed to this ml, you visited
http://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users for sure. Now,
what part of:
- - -
Subscribe to th
On Aug 16, 2005, at 7:42 AM, Gian Carlo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:35:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually, they say it's not a good thing...
Sorry, but I rather put it online then sending it into a mailing-list.
Forgive me: maybe I was too "purist".
I realize there are bett
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:35:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Usually, they say it's not a good thing...
>
> Sorry, but I rather put it online then sending it into a mailing-list.
Forgive me: maybe I was too "purist".
I realize there are better ways for a malicious person to get something
>Usually, they say it's not a good thing...
Sorry, but I rather put it online then sending it into a mailing-list.
>I still use old "ClamAV 0.84/1023/Mon Aug 15 22:15:08 2005" (Debian
>Sarge) but it says: "Happy99.exe.virus: Trojan.Happy99.SKA FOUND".
Hm...I guess the Online Scanner and the subm
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:53:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I put the file online here:
Ops!
Sorry for me too reporting the address. :-/
Bye,
gc :-/
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:53:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using the cygwin build of 0.86.2 (ClamAV devel-20050725 ...
> I put the file online here: http://www.breaken.de/temp/Happy99.exe.virus
Usually, they say it's not a good thing...
Anyway, I downloaded your file. ;-)
I still
I am using the cygwin build of 0.86.2 (ClamAV devel-20050725/1023/Mon Aug 15
22:15:08 2005) from http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php and a virus in
a file isn't recognised. I checked it with the Sophos scanner and it foudn the
virus, so I thought it was missing in the database, but the s
12 matches
Mail list logo
