On 04/20/05 12:57, Guillaume Arcas wrote:
Trog a écrit :
We are, of course, also looking for people to volunteer to become sig
makers. Assuming that they have the time and the relevant skills.
How would you define these skills ?
Sorry I'm in a hurry, but just to quote some:
Proper knoweledge and h
Trog a écrit :
We are, of course, also looking for people to volunteer to become sig
makers. Assuming that they have the time and the relevant skills.
How would you define these skills ?
Further I would say: how do actual sigmakers work ? Reverse-engineering
on new virus ? Scan its with other AV p
Trog wrote:
We are, of course, also looking for people to volunteer to become sig
makers. Assuming that they have the time and the relevant skills.
-trog
Excellent idea, trog. If you can let me know what has to be done, I'd
love to help making sigs.
Cheers
Bill
--
What's the difference between L
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:54 +0200, Christoph Cordes wrote:
> Niek wrote:
> > On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> >> Does it send itself via e-mail?
> >
> >
> > No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
> > So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
> > qualify
Niek wrote:
On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Does it send itself via e-mail?
No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
qualify to make it through the submit process ?
No, but Email borne malware has the highest priority.I k
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:29 +0200, Niek wrote:
> On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > Does it send itself via e-mail?
>
> No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
> So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
> qualify to make it through the submit process ?
No, se
On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Does it send itself via e-mail?
No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
qualify to make it through the submit process ?
Niek
___
http://lurker.cl
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:17:04 +0200
Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/19/2005 2:13 PM +0200, Albert Pauw wrote:
> > I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
> > They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
> > Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but i
On 4/19/2005 2:13 PM +0200, Albert Pauw wrote:
I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but it seems they are not
incorporated into updates. How long does it usually take fo
I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but it seems they are not
incorporated into updates. How long does it usually take for a submission to
enter the updates?
Thanks,
10 matches
Mail list logo
