Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-virusdb] Fwd: This mailing list

2003-08-22 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 at 9:22:20 +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > On Friday 22 August 2003 1:21 am, Yuval Kogman wrote: > > > Perhaps it is a good idea to slowly deprecate posts to the discussion > > list.. but i think redundancy is better. > > Far better, I think, to actively encourage posts to the

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-virusdb] Fwd: This mailing list

2003-08-22 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 22 August 2003 1:21 am, Yuval Kogman wrote: > Perhaps it is a good idea to slowly deprecate posts to the discussion > list.. but i think redundancy is better. Far better, I think, to actively encourage posts to the discussion list, and deprecate posts to the database announcement list

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-virusdb] Fwd: This mailing list

2003-08-21 Thread Yuval Kogman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Antony Stone wrote: > What are the (yes|version number|date|dancing) intended to indicate? some value... it's rexen for 'yes', or 'version number', or 'date', or 'dancing', but is actually ment to be taken more literally. Some ki

[Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-virusdb] Fwd: This mailing list

2003-08-21 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 22 August 2003 12:47 am, Yuval Kogman wrote: > In my opinion a more elegant solution would be to add a small header to > the mails with updates. > > Currently I have procmail search for > > Subject: [Clamav-virusdb] Update > > which is kinda makeshift... > > If i would have an > > X-Clam