Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-08 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Jenn wrote: [...] 2) Maybe I'm using the online scanner incorrectly? What I do is save the message (using my MS Outlook) as an HTML file and then submit that file? You should extract the raw message (headers and body), otherwise you miss important parts. I recommend using a tool like SpamGr

RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-07 Thread Jenn
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:23 PM To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9 > Good wiki food? > http://wiki.clamav.net/ Thank you!

RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote: > "create" your own signature database, by taking the official clamav > signature database and removing the phishing signatures from it. > > We're currently doing this, and I'm willing to share the scripts and > configs to do it, if there is interest. Good wiki food? http

RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Jenn
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Pieter Cornet > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:56 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9 > > No, you can also do that with the current version. You'll just have to > "c

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:20:37PM -0500, Jenn wrote: > So, to be sure I understand, clamav 0.9 > is what I would need if I wanted to turn off > the detection of "Phishing" by ignoring the currently > existing 500 (or so) "Phishing" signatures? No, you can also do that with the current version.

RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Noel Jones
At 04:20 PM 1/6/2006, Jenn wrote: So, to be sure I understand, clamav 0.9 is what I would need if I wanted to turn off the detection of "Phishing" by ignoring the currently existing 500 (or so) "Phishing" signatures? Right, 0.9 has this feature, 0.9 isn't released yet. I think the feature ex

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:53:11 -0500 "Jenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone help me to better understand the details regarding anti-phishing > support. The option to control the phishing detection is currently available in the CVS version only (DetectPhishing yes/no). -- oo.

RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Jenn
> The clamav virus database currently has about 500 > "Phishing" signatures to detect this type of > mail. Whenever clamav 0.9 is released, it will have the > ability to ignore admin-specified signatures. I don't > believe a timeline has been released of when to expect 0.9. > The archive con

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Noel Jones
At 03:53 PM 1/6/2006, Jenn wrote: This is # 13 taken from the FAQ: Q - Can phishing be considered one kind of spam? ClamAV should not detect it as some kind of malware. A - Starting from release 0.90, ClamAV allows you to choose whether to detect phish as some kind of malware or not. This sh

[Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-06 Thread Jenn
This is # 13 taken from the FAQ: Q - Can phishing be considered one kind of spam? ClamAV should not detect it as some kind of malware. A - Starting from release 0.90, ClamAV allows you to choose whether to detect phish as some kind of malware or not. This should put an end to the endless threads