On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 16:08 -0600, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:02:57 -0700 Hal Goldfarb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> alert packagers to get a jump? Maybe 2 or 3 days before the support
>> for the previously supported code is abandoned. Maybe won't work,
>You're still missing t
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:02:57 -0700
Hal Goldfarb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alert packagers to get a jump? Maybe 2 or 3 days before the support
> for the previously supported code is abandoned. Maybe won't work,
You're still missing the point here. Please read my yesterday's posts.
--
o
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 09:30, John Gallagher wrote:
> Your right 99.% of the people using computers are not Unix Admins. But
> they sure have an impact on the amount of traffic generated by infected
> systems sending email.
>
> While I agree that you should not hold up any code just so
benefit when the software
is easy to install and maintain for all types of users.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Grau
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 6:35 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83
> -Original Message-
> From: Hal Goldfarb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] No announcement of 0.83 on clamav-announce ML
>
> I am trying to play by the rules, honest. Can you instruct
> me on how to
> properly be informed of clamav code up
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their bum and sweep the floor at the
same time, too. Dayum, guy - this stuff is free. Get off your butt and
build your own binaries - hell, it takes maybe 10 minutes, is repeatable,
and you get all the credit.
Don't even suggest they put my Solaris s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hal Goldfarb
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:41 PM
>
> I am trying to play by the rules, honest. Can you instruct me on how to
> properly be informed of clamav code updates? I also think RPM binarie
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:16:25 -0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hal Goldfarb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue started out -- and then I went overboard because I felt
> frustrated -- that all of a sudden I discover that freshclam is not
> running, and only because I happened to be looking at it
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 at 3:16:25 -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
> [...]
> The issue started out -- and then I went overboard because I felt frustrated
> -- that all of a sudden I discover that freshclam is not running, and only
> because I happened to be looking at it at that moment. Why it stops run
Okay, okay.
I guess the RPM business went too far. And you are right this is free
software. But the thing that actually gets me is that when a new release of
Clam comes out, it seems like there is all sorts of catching up to do.
Believe it or not, I actually know how to use rpm tools. And I
Hi
> I also think RPM binaries
> should be made available before an official release.
This is not possible and even if it were, it shouldn't.
However, I agree to the point, that dns clam software version information
used by freshclam should be updated about 24 to 48 hours AFTER releasing a
new
On Feb 16, 2005, at 02:44, Dennis Peterson wrote:
christian laubscher said:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
[...] I also think RPM binaries
should be made available before an official release. [...]
please not!
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their
christian laubscher said:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
>> [...] I also think RPM binaries
>> should be made available before an official release. [...]
>
> please not!
Piggy-backing:
Maybe they could stick a broom up their bum and sweep the floor at the
sam
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb wrote:
> [...] I also think RPM binaries
> should be made available before an official release. [...]
please not!
--
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:40:42PM -0700, Hal Goldfarb said:
>
> I subscribed to the clamav-announce mailing list just yesterday. I guess
> that
> was too late to be informed of 0.83. However, I checked the archive for the
> clamav-announce list and there does not seem to be any mention of 0.
I subscribed to the clamav-announce mailing list just yesterday. I guess that
was too late to be informed of 0.83. However, I checked the archive for the
clamav-announce list and there does not seem to be any mention of 0.83 there
either. Or do I need to adjust my monitor, change browsers, o
16 matches
Mail list logo
