On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:46:31AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Until today you made no mention of static linking in this thread, if
>>> you had you may have had different answers ;)
>>
>> The question was all about linking and can have no ot
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:46:31AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> > Until today you made no mention of static linking in this thread, if
> > you had you may have had different answers ;)
>
> The question was all about linking and can have no other subtext,
> premise, or context, and was bas
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> And I wonder still if as delivered it can be built statically.
>> Obviously if it is only dynamically linked it will not survive a
>> ClamAV upgrade. At no time
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And I wonder still if as delivered it can be built statically.
> Obviously if it is only dynamically linked it will not survive a
> ClamAV upgrade. At no time did I mention using clamd as a option. It
> was such a s
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You learned from that answer that as distributed it can be statically
>> linked to libclamav? I shall read it again and again until I find
>> that
>> elusive fac
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You learned from that answer that as distributed it can be statically
> linked to libclamav? I shall read it again and again until I find that
> elusive factoid.
No, you asked if HAVP had to be rebuild when you upgrad
On Mar 26, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>
> --On 21 March 2008 08:31:11 -0700 Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> And while his answer was correct, it
>> was not helpful.
>
> It did very precisely answer the only question that you asked.
>
You learned from that answer
--On 21 March 2008 08:31:11 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And while his answer was correct, it
> was not helpful.
It did very precisely answer the only question that you asked.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
_
On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:31:11AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>> Answers of the RTMF type will never be popular with me. I did visit
>> the
>> web site prior to asking the question and learned the docs are in the
>> tarball, nothing on line. I
On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:51 PM, René Berber wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> On Mar 20, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade?
>>> Well - have a look and find out for yourself. It supports both
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade?
>>>
>> Well - have a look and find out for yourself. It supports both linking
>> against libclamav and merely calling clamd like cl
On Mar 20, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade?
>>
> Well - have a look and find out for yourself. It supports both linking
> against libclamav and merely calling clamd like clamdscan does. So
> "yes"
> a
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade?
>
Well - have a look and find out for yourself. It supports both linking
against libclamav and merely calling clamd like clamdscan does. So "yes"
and "no" are the answer.
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Informati
On Mar 20, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> Tarak Ranjan wrote:
>> Hi List,
>> Has anyone done the integration of ClamAV in Squid web proxy
>>
>>
> Yes - use HAVP! It's brilliant :-)
>
> http://www.server-side.de/
>
So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade?
dp
__
Tarak Ranjan wrote:
> Hi List,
> Has anyone done the integration of ClamAV in Squid web proxy
>
>
Yes - use HAVP! It's brilliant :-)
http://www.server-side.de/
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerp
Better use another proxy for this purpose.
dansguardian, or HAV, for instance.
Cheers,
Reiner
-
Beginnen Sie den Tag mit den neuesten Nachrichten. Machen Sie Yahoo! zu Ihrer
Startseite!
___
Help us b
Subject: [Clamav-users] Integrating ClamAV in Squid 2.6
>
> Hi List,
> Has anyone done the integration of ClamAV in Squid web proxy
>
>
> /\
> Tarak
>
>
> ___
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: vis
Hi List,
Has anyone done the integration of ClamAV in Squid web proxy
/\
Tarak
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
