On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> And I wonder still if as delivered it can be built statically. >> Obviously if it is only dynamically linked it will not survive a >> ClamAV upgrade. At no time did I mention using clamd as a option. It >> was such a simple question. > > Yes it was a very simple question: > >>> So does this have to be rebuilt each time ClamAV has an upgrade? > >> A simple answer might have been "it [ can >> | cannot ] be linked statically". The answer to my question was rtfm >> which I attempted to do, mind you. The answer to the question I did >> not ask was "use clamd". I can use clamd now without this product. > > Until today you made no mention of static linking in this thread, if > you had you may have had different answers ;)
The question was all about linking and can have no other subtext, premise, or context, and was based on information I saw on the website. That site shows only libclamav in the diagram. Even if it had shown usage with clamd the question is still valid, and one a programmer should understand. Now I'm so damned curious I've downloaded it and created a Linux sandbox to try it out on. dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
