On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:44:05AM -0600, Justin wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Jo Mills wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> >Just a thought - what was the return code from freshclam? Was it
> > "1" by any chance? I would be interested to know.
>
> Thanks for the reply, Jo. It looks like it's exiti
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> It seems you have changed the name of the main virus database with
> --with-dbname..
I removed both --with-db* configure options and recompiled (something I
remember now was that it wouldn't compile without them back when I first
got started with clam).
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > >Downloading main.cvd [*]
> > >viruses.db updated (version: 19, sigs: 19987, f-level: 1, builder:
>^^
>
> What's that ?
>
> It seems you have changed the name of the main virus database with
> --with-dbname..
Howdy, Tomasz. Thanks for the
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Jo Mills wrote:
> Justin,
>
>Just a thought - what was the return code from freshclam? Was it
> "1" by any chance? I would be interested to know.
Thanks for the reply, Jo. It looks like it's exiting with a 1.
Justin
--
Thanks for the reply.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> AFAIK, for every new install clamav always zeroes out main.cvd and
> daily.cvd. The real mistery is why you have non-zero daily.cvd but zero
> main.cvd
I didn't know this. Interesting...
> >Everything seems to be running smo
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:54:32 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's the b8946eefa674d8c5. The download wasn't completed
> because of (perhaps) network error.
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/share/clamav]#> freshclam
> >ClamAV update process started at Wed Feb 4 00
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:34:33AM -0600, Justin wrote:
> After getting 20040203 to compile tonight on my RH 9 box, I ran into
> trouble starting the new daemon. It was convinced I had a "Malformed
.
.
.
> Everything seems to be running smoothly now. I wonder though, should I
> have a main.cvd
Justin wrote:
After getting 20040203 to compile tonight on my RH 9 box, I ran into
trouble starting the new daemon. It was convinced I had a "Malformed
Database." The old version of clamd I was running didn't seem to think
so. I remembered reading something about clamd picking up all files i
After getting 20040203 to compile tonight on my RH 9 box, I ran into
trouble starting the new daemon. It was convinced I had a "Malformed
Database." The old version of clamd I was running didn't seem to think
so. I remembered reading something about clamd picking up all files in
the DBDIR an
