Hi
SOrry, didn't see this post before I post a reply to my own post.
The --mbox option seems to work for clamscan too.
Thanks Mike.
...
ling
Mike Cathey wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 14:06, Ling Ho wrote:
Anyone has this problem?
Try with --mbox
Cheers,
Mike
-
Found that clamdscan/clamd was able to detect the virus. My amavis-new
setup was using clamscan, not clamd. Now that I changed to clamd, the
virus can be detected properly. I probably need to update the clamscan
myself, not rely on Fedora site.
Sorry for the earlier post.
Thanks
...
ling
Ling H
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ling Ho
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Bagle.N Virus cannot be detected by local
> clamscan
>
>
> Hi
>
>
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 14:06, Ling Ho wrote:
> Anyone has this problem?
Try with --mbox
Cheers,
Mike
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo techn
Hi
One of my user (and possibly another) received a mail with an attachment
Document.zip and password in a jpeg file. McAfee detected it as Bagle.N and
ClamAV website site detected it as Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd-2 . However, when I ran
clamscan on my Linux mail server with update 185, it doesn't dete
