Re: [Clamav-users] Bagle.N Virus cannot be detected by local clamscan

[Ling C. Ho]

Found that clamdscan/clamd was able to detect the virus. My amavis-new 
setup was using clamscan, not clamd. Now that I changed to clamd, the 
virus can be detected properly. I probably need to update the clamscan 
myself, not rely on Fedora site.
Sorry for the earlier post.

Thanks
...
ling
Ling Ho wrote:

Hi

One of my user (and possibly another) received a mail with an attachment
Document.zip and password in a jpeg file. McAfee detected it as Bagle.N and
ClamAV website site detected it as Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd-2 . However, when I ran
clamscan on my Linux mail server with update 185, it doesn't detect the mail.
185 is the latest update I have at this point. The clamscan version is 0.65 .
Anyone has this problem?

Thanks
...
ling


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users