Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-13 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:31, Mike Sanchez wrote: > I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to scan > messages. > > With .80 top shows clamd < 5%, but on occasion once or twice a week climbs > to 20% - 30%. Really bogs down the system until clamd is restarted. > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread email builder
--- Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:39 PM 5/12/2005, email builder wrote: > > >Why would that help? If amavis/clam CPU usage with .80 is lower than with > >.84 (and .83 for me), then the problem seems to point right at clam > (unless > >the OP upgraded amavis or whatever). > > > >Y

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 12 May 2005 12:31:01 -0700 "Mike Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl > to scan messages. Does your script need to load the virus databases for each and every message? -- oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050512 22:40]: wrote: > > --- Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Mike Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050512 22:19]: wrote: > > > I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to > > scan > > > messages. > > > > > > W

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread Noel Jones
At 02:39 PM 5/12/2005, email builder wrote: Why would that help? If amavis/clam CPU usage with .80 is lower than with .84 (and .83 for me), then the problem seems to point right at clam (unless the OP upgraded amavis or whatever). Your response is more of *another* idea rather than a fix/solution,

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread email builder
--- Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050512 22:19]: wrote: > > I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to > scan > > messages. > > > > With .80 top shows clamd < 5%, but on occasion once or twice a week > climbs >

Re: [Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Mike Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050512 22:19]: wrote: > I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to scan > messages. > > With .80 top shows clamd < 5%, but on occasion once or twice a week climbs > to 20% - 30%. Really bogs down the system until clamd is restart

[Clamav-users] Any suggestions about CPU load in .80 and .84

2005-05-12 Thread Mike Sanchez
I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to scan messages. With .80 top shows clamd < 5%, but on occasion once or twice a week climbs to 20% - 30%. Really bogs down the system until clamd is restarted. I installed .84 on test system that already had .80, hoping CPU