RE: [Clamav-users] [OT] Was: ClamAV should not try to detect phishing

2004-11-15 Thread Julian Mehnle
Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Haven't you had any privacy issues from your users yet? Maybe a real > mail wrongly filed, with a subject line and a from address which gave > away something they'd rather was not public? The public table is just a static snapshot I took and anonymized befor

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Was: ClamAV should not try to detect phishing

2004-11-15 Thread Graham Toal
> Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Nice layout, BTW. > > Thanks. I'll probably have to improve it a bit, though, because the table > is far too wide for most screens. Haven't you had any privacy issues from your users yet? Maybe a real mail wrongly filed, with a subject line and a from address

RE: [Clamav-users] [OT] Was: ClamAV should not try to detect phishing

2004-11-15 Thread Julian Mehnle
Steve Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > http://julian.io.link-m.de/misc/rejected-messages > > Very nice. What did you use to create that? I am using Courier as my MTA and the self developed, Perl-based Courier::Filter for rejecting messages. I wrote a logger module for Cou

[Clamav-users] [OT] Was: ClamAV should not try to detect phishing

2004-11-15 Thread Matt
Julian Mehnle wrote: > Instead I outright reject unwanted messages during the SMTP > transaction, so the sender gets notified. My users can see what > messages have been rejected by skimming over a list of recently rejected > messages once or twice a week (see an example here[1]). This practice >