___
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>
u should use clamdscan. it is much faster than clamscan.
--
zamr
On Jan 5, 2008 9:00 PM, Luis Miguel R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Saturday, 05 January del 2008 a las 11:19:56AM, zamri escribió:
> > I tried to access certain sites and it has been detected containing
> virus. I
> > use dansguardian s.9.9.2 + clamav 0.92. I rememb
I tried to access certain sites and it has been detected containing virus. I
use dansguardian s.9.9.2 + clamav 0.92. I remember one right now. If you
have found one, pls list here so I can check it out for testing.
1. www.myviper.net
--
zamri
Linux System Administrator
Kolej ShahPutra Kuantan
__
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>
Are u sure u use clamd and not clamscan? Check settings in amavis. u
may set it to use clamscan. If yes, change it to clamd.
--
zamri
Linux System
-
apt-get install clamav right now should upgrade installed clamav to
the latest. I chose to compile from source because I can. :P
--
zamri
Linux System Administrator
Kolej ShahPutra Kuantan
Pahang Malaysia
Tel : 609.573.777.7 ext 119
web : http://mylinuxlife.b
On 11/18/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 at 14:59:24 +0800, zamri wrote:
> On 11/16/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 at 11:33:23 +0800, zamri wrote:
> >>
> >> That file was detected as
On 11/16/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 at 11:33:23 +0800, zamri wrote:
>
> That file was detected as worm for clamav 0.88.5. I think this is
> sufficient to prove that 0.90rc2 was not able to detect it and I
> presume 0.90rc2 virus
On 11/14/06, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
> I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise t
On 11/11/06, zamri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/11/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I can confirm this virus is not found with either 0.90.0RC1.1 nor with
0.90.rc2
> > on Sun Solaris 9 Sparc. It works fine with 0.90rc2 on Sol
On 11/11/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I can confirm this virus is not found with either 0.90.0RC1.1 nor with
0.90.rc2
> on Sun Solaris 9 Sparc. It works fine with 0.90rc2 on Sol 10 on Intel. A
> report looks like this:
>
> $ clamdscan -v strategy1.mbox
> /tmp/strategy1.mb
Hi all,
I use clamav 0.90rc2 and my friend uses clamav 0.88.5 (the latest
stable). Just now, after I ran freshclam, i run clamdscan for a worm.
His could detect it as worm and mine didn't. Why is that?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
