Re: [clamav-users] Clamav and auto updating

This is what CVD update is for: https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/cvdupdate Scott K On July 31, 2024 2:39:41 AM UTC, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote: >Your best bet would be to have freshclam running on one machine and have the >rest use the Ansible playbook to pull from that “freshclam

Re: [clamav-users] Seeking GUI alternative while learning how to use clamAV

For Debian and its derivatives, which includes Pop OS via Ubuntu, when you install the clamav-freshclam package, it is configured to run in background and periodically check for signature updates. You can, and should, ignore ClamTK's update mechanisms. To test if scanning is working, you can i

Re: [clamav-users] Announcing Fangfrisch release 1.9.0

On March 20, 2024 3:19:33 PM UTC, Ralph Seichter via clamav-users wrote: >* Damian via clamav-users: > >>> requirements.txt: >>> requests >= 2.22.0 >>> SQLAlchemy >= 1.4.0 >> >> Are those requirements sharp? I wonder if Fangfrisch could run on >> older Debian systems with Debian-shipped python

Re: [clamav-users] Debian libmspack breakage to fix y2038

On February 29, 2024 12:56:47 PM UTC, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users wrote: > >I haven't fully understood this yet, but Debian is planning a flag-day >on 29 March to fix the y2038 bug on 32bit systems (possibly excluding >intel). > >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106313

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Clamav 1.0.1 and email scan failed

On August 1, 2023 4:09:44 PM UTC, Fiorenza Meini via clamav-users wrote: > > >Il 31/07/23 18:06, Damian via clamav-users ha scritto: >>> Then I configured amavis on another VM so that it has to contact CLamav >>> through TCP connection to the VM where Clamav is installed. >>> But the error is

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav EOL Policy and Signatures

it with them some more before we make any decisions. But I didn't want to leave you hanging either. > >Regards, >Micah > > >Micah Snyder >ClamAV Development >Talos >Cisco Systems, Inc. > >____ >From: clamav-users on behalf of Scott K

[clamav-users] Clamav EOL Policy and Signatures

I don't know if this is new or if I missed it before, but, now that I've looked at https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-eol.html again, I have questions/ comments about the provision of signature support to EOL releases. A little over a month ago (Feb 18) one of the Fedora clamav maintainers raised

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV EOL of 0.104.x versions

On Thursday, March 23, 2023 4:23:28 PM EDT Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav- users wrote: > Read this online at > https://blog.clamav.net/2023/03/clamav-eol-of-0104x-versions.html > > > Effective March 28, 2023, ClamAV 0.104.0 (and all patch versions) will no > longer be supported in accordan

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.103.8, 0.105.2 and 1.0.1 patch versions published

No. Ubuntu package maintenance is separate from Debian's. Scott K On February 20, 2023 6:57:46 PM UTC, Newcomer01 via clamav-users wrote: >Does this mean, it affects the Ubuntu LTS too? This would be really great! > >Am 20. Februar 2023 19:44:51 schrieb Scott Kitterman vi

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.103.8, 0.105.2 and 1.0.1 patch versions published

LTS team uploaded it today, so it should be available for Buster shortly, if it isn't already. Scott K On Monday, February 20, 2023 7:41:16 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote: > Packages for Bullseye are available in bullseye -proposed-updates. Buster > is now suppo

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.103.8, 0.105.2 and 1.0.1 patch versions published

Packages for Bullseye are available in bullseye -proposed-updates. Buster is now supported by the Debian LTS team and I don't know their plans. Scott K On February 20, 2023 12:11:10 PM UTC, Brent Clark via clamav-users wrote: >Good day Guys > >Anyone on Debian Buster and Bullseye? > >How seri

Re: [clamav-users] Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8

On February 19, 2023 1:26:44 AM UTC, Michael Orlitzky via clamav-users wrote: >On 2023-02-18 15:40:55, Orion Poplawski via clamav-users wrote: >> >> This email is to start a discussion of what will happen with clamav >> support in EPEL7 and EPEL8. In particular, to inform everyone that it

Re: [clamav-users] Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8

On February 18, 2023 10:40:55 PM UTC, Orion Poplawski via clamav-users wrote: >I'm one of the maintainers of the clamav package in Fedora and Fedora EPEL. I >believe that the EPEL packages are currently one of the primary sources for >users of clamav on RHEL based distributions. > >We were

Re: [clamav-users] Upgrade to 1.0.0

lz4 was last updated in Debian in September 2022. If you're running Debian Unstable and not upgrading packages for months, that's not a distro problem. That said, lz4 isn't used by clamav, so whatever it was, that's likely a coincidence. Debian Unstable isn't for everyone. It's not uncommon f

Re: [clamav-users] Testing for Big Endian Architectures

On January 8, 2023 5:40:55 AM UTC, Orion Poplawski wrote: >On 1/6/23 14:29, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote: >> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:51:27 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users >> wrote: >>> We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable. >>&g

Re: [clamav-users] Testing for Big Endian Architectures

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:51:27 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote: > We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable. > > Unfortunately, unit tests fail on all big endian archs (shown in the PowerPC > build log [1] - it's the same tests failing on all of them

[clamav-users] Testing for Big Endian Architectures

We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable. Unfortunately, unit tests fail on all big endian archs (shown in the PowerPC build log [1] - it's the same tests failing on all of them). Does upstream testing include big endian? Does anyone have suggestions on how to fix it? I have access to

Re: [clamav-users] freshclam: Verification: Can't verify database integrity

It's a Debian issue. I haven't figured it out yet as nothing changed that seems like a likely source. In the meantime, the 0.103.7 package in Stable works on Testing/Unstable, so you can use that Scott K On December 28, 2022 10:31:40 PM UTC, Alexander Lochmann wrote: >Hi all! > >I'm seeing

[clamav-users] Documentation: Installing, Unix From Source

It looks like the Ubuntu/Debian instructions are somewhat out of date regarding installing CMake. Likely others too. In the currently published instructions: https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Installing-from-source-Unix.html There's a note that says: Note: Many of the instructions be

Re: [clamav-users] Starting clamd

On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 4:13:55 PM EDT John wrote: > I apologise in advance if this question is trivial but I am getting > very lost. > > I have been running clamav as part of my mailer's anti-spam system for > years. More recently I started using the Debian package rather that a > self-buil

Re: [clamav-users] Locating clamav-milter to match v0.104.2

On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:38:02 PM EST Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote: > HI Michael, Ged, > > clamav-milter is indeed a part of the clamav project. As Ged notes, it > hasn't changed in many years - at least not since I started here over 4 > years ago. > > Unfortunately, the

Re: [clamav-users] Long Term Support (LTS) program proposal

On July 28, 2021 11:53:35 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users" wrote: > >Hi All, > >For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long Term >Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos communications. > >For the purposes of this discuss

Re: [clamav-users] Cannot install Clam AV on Ubuntu 16.04

For Debian derived distributions like Ubuntu you are best off installing distribution packages using apt. They are kept reasonably up to date and resolution of security issues in the packages us supported by the Ubuntu Security Team. There are many Ubuntu and Debian specific resources on how t

Re: [clamav-users] clamav from python?

On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 4:23:18 PM EST John Shelton via clamav-users wrote: > The interface for cl_scanfile changed to accept a new struct cl_scan_options > type from what used to be an int. Is there any backward compatibility for > this change? AFAIK, there isn't. You probably need to do

Re: [clamav-users] clamsmtpd does not scan rar files

us=VIRUS:Archived_EXE.UNOFFICIAL > Unofficial because I mark every exe in archive as a virus. (as explained > previously) > > On 04.02.20 22:33, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 3:26:42 PM EST Ntek, SIA Janis wrote: > >>>

Re: [clamav-users] clamsmtpd does not scan rar files

On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 3:26:42 PM EST Ntek, SIA Janis wrote: > > libclamunrar9 > > I already had that, didn't help. I will upgrade Debian 9.7 to 10 It's extremely unlikely to make any difference. They both have clamav 0.101 available and after this weekend's point release they will both h

Re: [clamav-users] clamsmtpd does not scan rar files

On February 4, 2020 1:28:45 AM UTC, "Gary R. Schmidt" wrote: >On 04/02/2020 11:38, Ntek, SIA Janis wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have Debian 9.7 w/ postfix and ClamAV 0.100.2  I have made custom >> definition file /var/lib/clamav/archive_exe.cdb containing: >> Archived_EXE:*:*:.*\.exe:*:*:*:*:*:* >

Re: [clamav-users] How to boost clamav? Reloading database results in a talking timeout?

On August 31, 2019 4:32:00 PM UTC, Henrik K wrote: >On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:21:11PM -0400, Scott Kitterman via >clamav-users wrote: >> >> Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you are unhappy with the >service you >> are receiving, you should switch to a d

Re: [clamav-users] How to boost clamav? Reloading database results in a talking timeout?

On Saturday, August 31, 2019 12:04:36 PM EDT Henrik K wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:48:54PM +0100, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > > More testing, by people prepared to chip in some effort instead of > > complaining about something that they get for free, would be great. > > The fina

Re: [clamav-users] Packaging ClamAV

On Monday, August 12, 2019 4:49:01 PM EDT Nick Howitt wrote: > On 12/08/2019 19:16, J.R. via clamav-users wrote: > >> I would suggest not packaging them at all, and they > >> should be downloaded from the update servers the > >> first time the update is ran. > > > > Ideally yes, I would agree. > >

Re: [clamav-users] Freshclam seems locked and can not be unlocked.

On August 4, 2019 11:32:09 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users" wrote: >Every product is different as to whether or not they provide security >patches for older versions or how far back they patch. > >For ClamAV, our development team is very small and we have a lot on our >plat

Re: [clamav-users] Debian Testing

Debian Testing has the current version: testing: 0.101.2+dfsg-1 You need to upgrade your packages. If you need help with that, you should use a Debian specific support resource. Scott K ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] milter-manager.sock: No such file or directory

On Friday, May 31, 2019 8:50:13 AM EDT Maurizio Caloro wrote: > Hello > > I try to setup clamav-milter to running with Postfix, i don't understund > now not why Clam/Postfix cant Write/Access to this file. > > i try meny things now also root:root, Postfix:Postfix, Calmav and so > > clamav-milter

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav for educational institutions ?

On Saturday, April 06, 2019 04:51:16 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:12, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users > >> wrote: The unrar stuff is still free to > >> use. > >> > >> Due to modification restrictions Debian sp

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav for educational institutions ?

does a pretty good job as a clamav distributor. Scott K On April 6, 2019 12:21:05 AM UTC, "Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote: >Correct. Which is why we recommend people compile from source for full >functionality. > >Sent from my  iPhone > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav for educational institutions ?

The unrar stuff is still free to use. Due to modification restrictions Debian splits it off into the unofficial non-free repository. Scott K On April 6, 2019 12:03:03 AM UTC, "J.R. via clamav-users" wrote: >I just doubled checked, but I don't see a LICENSE file in the >clamav-0.101.2.tar.gz a

Re: [clamav-users] rpm files question [was: ClamAV 0.101.2 announcement?]

On Friday, March 29, 2019 06:01:25 PM G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Micah Snyder wrote: > > This won't help you right now, but our team has been discussing > > publishing ClamAV on Linux using Snapcraft at the time of each > > release. Snapcraft sounds

Re: [clamav-users] Any way to auto-update Clam engine (freshclam or any other tools)

On March 12, 2019 11:22:05 AM UTC, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via clamav-users wrote: >On 12.03.19 13:58, Sunhux G via clamav-users wrote: >>I'm on Solaris 10 x86 : we disabled compilers as part of our OS >hardening; >>much appreciated if someone can help me make/compile one for our OS. >>So far I

Re: [clamav-users] Any way to auto-update Clam engine (freshclam or any other tools)

Isn't that issue fixed in 0.100.1? As I recall, 0.101.0 and .1 didn't provide any security fixes, at least not as identified as such. Scott K On March 12, 2019 3:51:03 AM UTC, Sunhux G via clamav-users wrote: >Does freshclam auto-update Clam's engine. > >Recently there's a vulnerability ( ht

Re: [clamav-users] Testing

On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 05:26:36 PM Eric Tykwinski wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > > Joel Esler (jesler) skrev den 2019-02-20 23:14: > >> Testing! > > > > DKIM and DMARC still fails > > > > no news there :( > > Yeah, I gave up on that and just whitel

Re: [clamav-users] pwdb files still supported ?

Yes. Debian packages are built with yara support. Scott K On February 6, 2019 5:22:48 PM UTC, Arnaud Jacques wrote: >Hello Andrew, > >I use clamav provided by debian 8.11 : >dpkg -l|grep clam >ii  clamav 0.100.2+dfsg-0+deb8u1  amd64    >anti-virus utility for Unix - co

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.101.0 / HAVP

One of the other Debian clamav maintainers sent him patches for 0.101.1 support with libclamav, in addition to others we've been carrying. Scott K On Monday, February 04, 2019 03:24:42 PM Micah Snyder wrote: > Paul, > > Just heard back from Christian Hilgers. He has just released HAVP v0.93 >

Re: [clamav-users] warning: connect to Milter service unix:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl: No such file or directory

On Monday, January 28, 2019 11:10:17 PM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to use ClamAV with Postfix and ClamAV milter on Debian 9. > After installing clamav-milter package it uses > /var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl unix domain socket as MilterSocket > by default setting. So I added

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

> >> Other changes > >> > >> Increased the default CommandReadTimeout to reduce the chance of mail > >> loss if using clamav-milter with the TCP socket. Contribution by Scott > >> Kitterman. Fixes for --with-libjson and --with-libcurl to correctly >

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! as reported by freshclam utility on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

ct, rely on updates like that to > tell them when they need to go update packages. > > On Dec 13, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Scott Kitterman > > wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to turn off the outdated warning until that happens? > > > > Scott K > > > >

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! as reported by freshclam utility on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

Would it be possible to turn off the outdated warning until that happens? Scott K On December 13, 2018 3:02:59 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd)" wrote: >Because of the libclamav header issue I disclosed last week, most >package managers are holding off on packaging 0.101.0. Some projects >that

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! as reported by freshclam utility on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

me to >look into this -- rather expected -- problem. > > >On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:54:08 -0500 >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as released is not >> suitable for distribution use to to shared library header issues >> (mentio

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! as reported by freshclam utility on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

> 0.101.0 is the latest stable version > > robert > > > On 13 Dec 2018, at 07:54, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as released is not suitable > > for distribution use to to shared library header issues (mentioned on &g

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! as reported by freshclam utility on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

A larger issue in this case is that 0.100.0, as released is not suitable for distribution use to to shared library header issues (mentioned on this list a few days ago - I appreciate Cisco being forthcoming and warning people). I don't know what EPEL/CentOS will do, but 0.100.0 won't be in Debi

Re: [clamav-users] Question about LLVM...

On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 05:59:05 PM Micah Snyder wrote: > Sorry about the broken links on the website and in the clamav-faq manual > pages. Our web dev team is actively working on integrating the newly > remodeled user manual into the website. > > The bytecode interpreter was nonfunctional

Re: [clamav-users] Strange behaviors about syslog on Debian

On November 13, 2018 10:28:27 PM UTC, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: >Hello, > >I use ClamAV 0.100.2 on Debian 9.6. Everything works fine about virus >scan. But when seeing syslog I found 2 strange behaviors. > >1. Message is written to syslog even if LogSyslog is false. > >On Debian LogSyslog is set t

Re: [clamav-users] Clam user has read permissions, but I still get "lstat() failed: Permission denied"

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 07:01:40 PM Doug Ingham wrote: > >and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions > > If www-data didn't have r/w access to that directory, my site would be > broken! > > From the (redacted) comand output I copied above: > >> root@arquivos0:/var

Re: [clamav-users] Clam user has read permissions, but I still get "lstat() failed: Permission denied"

Apparmor/SE Linux is another possibility. Scott K On October 30, 2018 9:29:28 PM UTC, SCOTT PACKARD wrote: >You'd want to: >ls -ld / >ls -ld /var >ls -ld /var/www >l s-ld /var/www/nc_data >and make sure user www-data has at least read and execute permissions >to the parent directories. >You pro

Re: [clamav-users] nautilus-actions: is my command for clamscan correct?

On August 11, 2018 2:21:30 PM UTC, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >On August 11, 2018 11:48:32 AM UTC, Christian >wrote: >> >>Hi altogether, >> >>What I want to achieve is create a /context-menu/ (rightclick)-entry >>for >>scanning files with the *cl

Re: [clamav-users] nautilus-actions: is my command for clamscan correct?

On August 11, 2018 11:48:32 AM UTC, Christian wrote: > >Hi altogether, > >What I want to achieve is create a /context-menu/ (rightclick)-entry >for >scanning files with the *clamscan*-command. > >For ubuntu there is a tool called _"nautilus-actions_". With it one can >create right-click-entries.

Re: [clamav-users] clamav 0.100.0 - /var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl: No such file or directory

On July 18, 2018 8:54:36 PM UTC, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > > >Hello > >please i was thinking that i had permission error but if change from >clamav >:clamav to postsfix:postfix clamav-milter.ctl > >nothing has change to me error < /var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl: No >such >file or directory >

Re: [clamav-users] apparmor="DENIED" operation="rename_src" profile="/usr/bin/freshclam"

On June 24, 2018 1:52:53 PM UTC, Chris wrote: >I was out of town last week and when I got home I noticed the above >while going through my hourly syslog snippets. The complete output can >be found here - https://pastebin.com/vyjqMJwb I've restarted freshclam >by running sudo /etc/init.d/clamav-f

Re: [clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

On Thursday, June 21, 2018 02:38:45 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/06/18 00:46, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > > Our operations group in Talos has updated the SPF record for > > lists.clamav.net to account for the issue w/ > > Cisco's SPF records. In additi

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Re: WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

On June 20, 2018 8:38:50 AM UTC, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >* Philip : >> Has this been released yet by the major Distros? I'm using Debian 9 >and >> can't get any higher than 0.99.x > >Debian has 0.100: >https://packages.debian.org/buster/clamav > >I used that source package to rebuild for my U

Re: [clamav-users] WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

On June 19, 2018 2:17:18 AM UTC, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >Hi > >Receiving the message: WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended >version: 0.100.0 > >So I did > > [root /tmp] #>yum info installed clamd > Installed Packages > Name: clamd > Arch: x86_64 > Version : 0.

Re: [clamav-users] Updating from 0.99.4 to 0.100.0 on Ubuntu 16.04

On Monday, April 30, 2018 03:49:52 PM David Bond wrote: > I have a requirement to update our current version of ClamAV (0.99.4) to the > latest release (0.100). However due to the change in the name of the > required socket file (from clamd.ctl to clamav-daemon.socket), the running > system seems t

Re: [clamav-users] ERROR: This tool requires libclamav with functionality level 91 or higher (current f-level: 85)

On April 11, 2018 7:09:07 PM UTC, "Alberto José García Fumero" wrote: >Hi all. > >I'm trying to install clamav-0100 in the office Linux box (Debian 9.4). > >The compilation process goes as a breeze, but when I try to launch >clamscan, the only result I have is that error message: "ERROR: This

Re: [clamav-users] Can't Install ClamAV

On February 3, 2018 3:09:29 AM UTC, Al Varnell wrote: >On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:06 PM, Paul B. wrote: >>> You can't mix distro packages and builds from upstream source >>> on the same system. If you're going to switch from one to the >>> other, you have to uninstall. >> >>> Scott K >> >> Th

Re: [clamav-users] Can't Install ClamAV

On February 2, 2018 9:14:04 PM UTC, "Paul B." wrote: >> Synaptic should be able to show you enough information to track down >the >> missing dependencies, or allow you to uninstall them. Note that this >> may break your installed-from-source working ClamAV, depending on >where >> it was install

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.99.3 has been released!

On January 28, 2018 2:35:59 AM UTC, Dennis Peterson wrote: >On 1/26/18 2:39 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Couldn't (old) 0.99.3 beta users just have ignored (new) 0.99.3? As >far as I can tell, the beta had all the fixes. >> >> Assuming that is correct, I think

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.99.3 has been released!

On January 26, 2018 2:54:57 PM UTC, "Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote: > > >On Jan 26, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Reindl Harald >mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > >Am 26.01.2018 um 15:40 schrieb Joel Esler (jesler): >As previously mentioned, if you downloaded the beta version of ClamAV >0.99.3, you wil

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.99.3 has been released!

Historically, fixes for such issues would have not been part of a pre-release. They would have been added to the public VCS on release day. You may not have been able to announce the CVEs for some reason, but I don't think silently disclosing the fixes was the best thing to have done. Scott K

Re: [clamav-users] 99.3 for Ubuntu

On January 25, 2018 11:18:41 PM UTC, Chris wrote: >I'm trying to build 99.3 for Ubuntu 16.04LTS. I had no problems >building 99.2 with pbuilder. When downloading the source I got > >pull-lp-source clamav >pull-lp-source: Downloading clamav version 0.99.3~beta1+dfsg-2ubuntu1 >pull-lp-source: Down

Re: [clamav-users] Question regarding libclamunrar6

On Thursday, November 30, 2017 05:02:11 PM Jonathan Sélea wrote: > On 11/30/2017 01:41 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 29.11.17 17:31, Jonathan Sélea wrote: > >> Is there any alternative to the package "libclamunrar6"? For example a > >> package that have the GPLv3 license? > > > > I doub

Re: [clamav-users] configure packaging problem

On October 20, 2017 5:36:12 PM EDT, Zetan Drableg wrote: >Hi, I'm building and packaging clamav in a RPM for distribution to some >systems without EPEL access. >While it installs ok, the default paths are absolute paths of my build >server, not of the client system. > >tar xvzf clamav-0.99.2.ta

Re: [clamav-users] When and what version will next release be?

Last I recall hearing about the schedule, Cisco said they planned to release in July. Not sure what the plan is now. Scott K On August 31, 2017 3:00:03 PM EDT, Al Varnell wrote: >0.99.3 is in beta testing at this time. > >Sent from my iPhone > >-Al-

Re: [clamav-users] Condition: start condition failed at Fri 2017-03-17 14:45:52 IST; 42min ago

On March 17, 2017 12:35:02 PM EDT, Baskaranand wrote: >Hi, > >Ububtu 16.04.2 server edition > >ClamAV 0.99.2 installed > >postfix 3.1.0-3 installed > >I could not reload the clamav-daemon.service due to the below issue. > >How to solve it > >-

Re: [clamav-users] Daily 23161 broke Clam

breaking > >package dependancies since there will be no upgrades (although, there >is >an additional "extended life phase" that RHEL5 systems can obtain, so >the April 1st date is not necessarily accurate). > >Your favorite distro probably handles this versioning better th

Re: [clamav-users] Daily 23161 broke Clam

As far as I can tell, pcre 7 came out before 2008. I think a decade is enough time to insist people upgrade. Scott K On Friday, March 03, 2017 11:21:30 PM Joel Esler wrote: > If we required pcre 7, it would allow us to publish this kind of sig in the > future of 99.3 and high versions by requir

Re: [clamav-users] Clamscan Error

It might also be Apparmor (since it's apparently an Ubuntu derivative). Scott K On January 5, 2017 9:03:54 PM EST, Al Varnell wrote: >Summary shows the current engine 0.99.2. > >LibCLamAV warnings might be lack of RAM. > >-Al- > >On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> you

Re: [clamav-users] clamav not in debian ?

In Debian that's generally true, but we do upgrade clamav, it sometimes takes awhile to get it done. Scott K On May 25, 2016 7:44:47 PM EDT, "Yury A. Romanov" wrote: >This is a common 'frozen release' distro issue. After the system is >released, no version changes is permitted for the majority

Re: [clamav-users] clamav not in debian ?

On May 25, 2016 7:49:44 PM EDT, "Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com" wrote: >Le jeudi 26 mai 2016, 01:27:02 sebast...@debianfan.de a écrit : >> i am using aptitude for updating the system but freshclam ist showing >this: >> :~# freshclam >> >> ClamAV update process started at Thu May 26 01:25:5

Re: [clamav-users] deepin 15.1

On April 28, 2016 12:46:17 PM EDT, Roy Fischer wrote: >I don't see deepin 15 on the list of supported linux distros and am >wondering if anyone has tried clamav on it. As an Ubuntu derivative, it should have clamav packaged and it should work fine just as it would on Debian or Ubuntu. Scott K

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV - References

As I understand it, anyone using Barracuda [1] is using clamav. Scott K [1] https://www.barracuda.com/products/emailsecuritygateway On Monday, April 18, 2016 05:53:10 PM TR Shaw wrote: > You should remind your security dept that ClamAV is owned and maintained by > Cisco. > > On Apr 18, 2016, at

Re: [clamav-users] Locky Dridex plan

On March 26, 2016 11:24:32 AM EDT, Freddie Cash wrote: >On Mar 26, 2016 6:26 AM, "C.D. Cochrane" wrote: >> >> And I am guessing my Linux distro will not just seamlessly move on to >0.99 by itself with an "apt-get update". > >Debian 6 includes ClamAV 0.98. Thus, anything newer than that will hav

Re: [clamav-users] Unable to run freshclam on Debian Jessie

On Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:38:16 PM Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > --- deb...@kitterman.com wrote: > >From: Scott Kitterman > >To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Unable to run freshclam on Debian Jessie > >Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:

Re: [clamav-users] Unable to run freshclam on Debian Jessie

On Saturday, February 27, 2016 06:43:05 PM Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > Ok, I installed ClamAV on Debian Jessie using the command: > > sudo apt-get install clamav clamav-daemon > > Next I tried to update the database: > > sudo freshclam > > The following error messages came up: > > ERROR: /va

Re: [clamav-users] [Fwd: [sanesecurity] Hacking Team detection]

On August 7, 2015 9:17:44 PM EDT, Gene Heskett wrote: >On Friday 07 August 2015 18:34:30 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On August 7, 2015 6:30:42 PM EDT, Gene Heskett >wrote: >> >On Friday 07 August 2015 16:58:09 Al Varnell wrote: >> >> Gene, >> >>

Re: [clamav-users] [Fwd: [sanesecurity] Hacking Team detection]

On August 7, 2015 6:30:42 PM EDT, Gene Heskett wrote: >On Friday 07 August 2015 16:58:09 Al Varnell wrote: > >> Gene, >> >> It’s on the sanesecurity.net mirror sites, not the ones clamav.net >> provides, so freshclam isn’t going to find those. >> >> As Steve said earlier, you would have to insta

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd and Systemd

On Friday, June 19, 2015 02:20:12 PM Simon Hobson wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> Given that I wouldn't be bothered at all if SystemD was "just" an init > >> system, it's all the other crap I want to keep out. Do you really think > >> I

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd and Systemd

On June 19, 2015 3:05:27 AM EDT, Simon Hobson wrote: >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> Is "harmless" supposed to include "not installable" ? >> >> No. What's not installable? >> >> Install clamav-daemon (with the lib) and don&

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd and Systemd

On June 19, 2015 3:05:27 AM EDT, Simon Hobson wrote: >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> Is "harmless" supposed to include "not installable" ? >> >> No. What's not installable? >> >> Install clamav-daemon (with the lib) and don&

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd and Systemd

ng me nuts today. Perhaps it's just "what I'm used to" >but I prefer Debian to most other distros - I learned my first Unix >with SCO Xenix and then Openserver5. > > >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> Also, does anyone know how "important" this

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd and Systemd

On June 18, 2015 10:52:39 AM EDT, Simon Hobson wrote: >I've been trying to upgrade a Debian Wheezy system to Jessie without >allowing SystemD to sneak in. I've found that the Debian clamav-daemon >package (but none of the others) depends on libsystemd0. > >I just wanted to check whether this is so

Re: [clamav-users] Scan of RAR problem

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 07:57:28 PM Kees Theunissen wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, jose-marcio martins da cruz wrote: > > On 04/29/2015 06:20 PM, René Bellora wrote: > >> El 29/04/15 a las 13:04, jose-marcio martins da cruz escibió: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I'm getting different results when s

Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging

On Monday, March 30, 2015 06:37:52 PM Torge Husfeldt wrote: > Hi, > > sorry to warm up this _really_old_ topic. > > Am 11.02.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Popovitch: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > >> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a > >> mont

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-milter LocalNet option / outgoing mail (Debian Wheezy)

On Monday, February 23, 2015 03:35:57 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 23.02.15 14:46, Daniel Spies wrote: > >>The process configured to use msa.example.com (or more likely > >> > >> smtp.example.com to satisfy some autoconfiguration algorithms) would > >> listen on ports 587, 25, and 465 (unf

Re: [clamav-users] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Calamav cannot scan tar file and gzip files?

On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:58:02 PM Manoj Ramakrishnan wrote: > On 18/02/15 6:09 AM, "Steven Morgan" wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Manoj Ramakrishnan < > > > >manojramakrish...@nbnco.com.au> wrote: > >> Hi Al, > >> > >> Thanks for replying. > >> It is exactly what I thought. Bu

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav on Debian

On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:17:14 Richard Thibaudeau wrote: > Hi everyone > > For at least two weeks I'm searching the Internet to find a solution to: > > root@debian:/# freshclam > ERROR: Parse error at line 4: Unknown option LocalSocket > ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /etc/clamav/

Re: [clamav-users] Warning in ClamAV update process

On Saturday, September 13, 2014 12:07:46 Gene Heskett wrote: > And then even more time to convince TPTB in charge of the major > distributions, that the upgrade needs to find its way into their repo's. > I am on an older ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS install, with enough X and kde to get > what I want, bu

Re: [clamav-users] File::Scan::ClamAV

On Monday, July 21, 2014 21:47:34 Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 12:52 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Sunday, July 20, 2014 07:27:25 Chris wrote: > > > On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 13:32 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > On 19.07.14 21:38, Chris wro

Re: [clamav-users] File::Scan::ClamAV

On Sunday, July 20, 2014 07:27:25 Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 13:32 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 19.07.14 21:38, Chris wrote: > > >Finally I'm about finished with setting up my Ubuntu 14.04 system and > > >getting everything setup the way it was in the old Mandriva system. I

Re: [clamav-users] Problem connecting to CISCO Secure Desktop VPN

stalled - it only > > complains > > that it is not active > > > > Benni > > > > Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014, 09:51:39 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > > On Thursday, July 17, 2014 09:29:31 Benedikt Mas y Parareda wrote: > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [clamav-users] Problem connecting to CISCO Secure Desktop VPN

On Thursday, July 17, 2014 09:29:31 Benedikt Mas y Parareda wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to connect to a CISCO protected VPN from Ubuntu 14.04, using the > ClamAV version from its repositories 0.98.1 > > When connecting, the VPN performs a check for an anti-virus tool. It > correctly detects the

Re: [clamav-users] 98.4 under Ubuntu 14.04.LTS

On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 16:46:33 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 15:21 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 13:03:55 Chris wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 01:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > On Monday, July 14, 2014 23:36:51

  1   2   >