--- Pete D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently running ClamAV 0.83 with
> clamav-milter
> and just recently received an infected email with a
> zip attachment. Strange thing is that clamdscan
> does
> not detect the virus while clamscan does.
>
> # clamds
I am currently running ClamAV 0.83 with clamav-milter
and just recently received an infected email with a
zip attachment. Strange thing is that clamdscan does
not detect the virus while clamscan does.
# clamdscan error-mail_info.zip
/tmp/error-mail_info.zip: OK
--- SCAN SUMMARY -
sn't catch, the amavisd/clamd does.
This is a bit off topic, but I noticed that there is a
clamav-milter for sendmail. Would using this simply
do away with having to use amavisd?
Thanks.
--- Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Pete
Thanks for the great tip! The sigtool command works
beautifully. However, it does make me wonder if there
is a bug with the leave-temps flag.
Thanks again.
--- aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/19/04 17:26, Pete D wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I just upgraded
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses these db
files for preliminary virus detection. The
--leave-temps flag, which wo
