Title: Message
Amit:
What
do you have in your clamav.conf for ArchiveBlockEncrypted ?
The
default should be disabled (commented out).
Micha
-Original Message-From: Amit Keshan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
11:43 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
>
> I would love to get emailed a notice when the virus database
> has been updated, and when it tried but failed.
I use the two options in freshclam.conf: OnUpdateExecute and OnErrorExecute
to call a small script that sends me a success (or failure when that
happens) message each time. "Quick a
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:58:20 +0300
Micha Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reverted back to using clamscan within the qmail-scanner.pl script
(causing higher CPU and memory usage) and went for help on the
qmail-scanner list. Today I finally hit on my proble
I have been running clamav 0.70 from qmail-scanner-queue.pl for some
months now. This is on a Fedora Core 1 server. This week I got the
latest 0.72 version from Petr's crash-hat site using yum. I kept my
original clamav.conf file, and after the update, freshclam started OK,
as well as clamd.
Ho
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Kristof
> > Petr
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:02 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] upgrading clamav changes permissions on
> > directories?
> >
> > Hello
Jeff Bilder wrote:
Hey Micha,
Thanks for the reponse. Here is some more output. I do have multilog running fine. My qmail is supervised just fine and so are the log files. Here are the permissions on my /var/log/clamd dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] electro]# ls -l /var/log/ |grep clamd
drwxr-xr-x
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Bilder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Supervised Clamd
>
>
>
> Has anyone gotten Clamd to run with daemontools? I have a
> clamd running supervised, but the log fil
I've had clamav 0.65 running for a while now, where my qmail-scanner.pl
script was using clamdscan to call clamd. All was working fine
(including catching the recent Worm.SCO business). Last night, in an
attempt to stop the "Virus FOund" messages being sent to falsified
sender addresses, I adde
t* be owned by qscand.
Once I got the ownerships back as it should be, I could set Q-S.pl to use
clamdscan again.
BTW, I posted this problem twice, since the first message took a few days
(!) to appear on the list, and I thot it had "got lost".
> -Original Message-----
> From:
Last night, in an attempt to stop the "Virus Found" notifications being
sent to a false sender address by the Worm.SCO.A, I added to my
silent_viruses_array in the Q-S.pl script 'worm.sco.a'. (right after
'klez','bugbear')
As soon as I did that, clamav stopped recognizing the virus.
I had been
Last night I made a small change to qmail-scanner.pl- I added 'worm.sco.a'
to the array $silent_viruses_array. (To prevent sending Virus Found messages
to innocent "sender" addresses)
It now looks like:
my
@silent_viruses_array=('klez','bugbear','worm.sco.a','hybris','yaha','braid'
,'nimda','tanat
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Kojm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] pretty basic question - clamscan
> vs clamdscan
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:36:18 +0200
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Kojm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 12:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] pretty basic question - clamscan
> vs clamdscan
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:04:50 +0200
>
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 at 12:07:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ clamscan Worm.Yaha.Y.msg
Worm.Yaha.Y.msg: OK
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 19802
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.08 Mb
I/O buffer size: 131072
14 matches
Mail list logo
