Tomasz Papszun wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 at 12:07:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


$ clamscan Worm.Yaha.Y.msg
Worm.Yaha.Y.msg: OK

----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 19802
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.08 Mb
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 0.718 sec (0 m 0 s)


$ clamdscan Worm.Yaha.Y.msg /tmp/Worm.Yaha.Y.msg: Worm.Yaha.Y FOUND

----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 1
Time: 0.026 sec (0 m 0 s)


As you can see, clamscan didn't find a virus in the mail message, but clamdscan did!



I've been following this thread and I'm trying to get my head around the different options for running clamav with qmail-scanner-queue.pl:
1- Call clamscan for each mail message: The surest method, but slow.
2- Call clamdscan, which needs to have the clamd daemon running: Much faster but clamd dies every so often. So we need the perl script, clamdwatch, contributed by Mike running every minute as a cron job.


Is this a correct summary of what's been discussed?
On the Clamav site, in the clamd_supervised doc page, there's an explanation and scripts for managing clamd with the service mechanism of daemontools. Is this a reasonable alternative to the clamdwatch script running as a cron job?


Thanks,
--Micha





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to