keep it up!
Regards,
Flinn Mueller
ActiveIntra.net, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toll Free: 1-800-640-4876 ext. 251
GnuPG (ID 27AE2CA9)
506B 1794 E240 ECEB 0758 2F90 6943 17A1 27AE 2CA9
---
ActiveIntra.net - Web Design, Web Programming, Web Hosting
I have seen some software products perceived too compl
On Feb 19, 2004, at 11:03 AM, LOYET Jerome wrote:
I cannot test milter on 3.3 for now but I will (let me time to untar
src.tar.gz and to recompile sendmail).
I've suppress the patch for clamscan/defaults.h and everything is fine
for
obsd 3.3. I will try on 3.4 after.
Is clamav compiling fine now
Unacceptably low signal-to-noise ratio... :-(
Is it really that big of a deal?
And why am I the only one being told about this? ;-)
Regards,
Flinn Mueller
ActiveIntra.net, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toll Free: 1-800-640-4876 ext. 251
GnuPG (ID 27AE2CA9)
506B 1794 E240 ECEB 0758 2F90 6943 17A1 27AE
quot;
Clamscan is working good, clamd, clamdscan and freshclam too
If someone could test and if the test will be a success, I will
publish the
port.
++ Jerome
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Flinn
Mueller
Envoyé : mercredi 18 févr
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Flinn
Mueller
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 21:21
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Clamav-users] OpenBSD Port
I get this too.
On Feb 18, 2004, at 9:25 AM, LOYET Jerome wrote:
With the port I've made for 0.67-1, which work
out this.
++ Jerome
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Flinn
Mueller
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 14:20
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Clamav-users] OpenBSD Port
Anyone using 3.3 please let me know about your success or failure w
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Flinn
Mueller
Inviato: mercoledì 18 febbraio 2004 14.43
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: [Clamav-users] OpenBSD Clamav.0.67-1
that's what I've got on 3.3
if you go into the make file and remove -L/us
On Feb 18, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Walter wrote:
I have the same problem with port you have made, but i remove
-L/usr/local/lib in Makefile and I have new error:
Which makefile?
w-clamav-0.67-1/clamav-0.67-1/Makefile
or
w-clamav-0.67-1/clamav-0.67-1/clamscan/Makefile
I should have been more specific.
that's what I've got on 3.3
if you go into the make file and remove -L/usr/local/lib from LDFLAGS
in the Makefile it will continue.
On Feb 18, 2004, at 8:05 AM, Walter wrote:
I have a problem to compile Clamav 0.67-1 in OpenBSD 3.4:
manager.o: In function `scanmanager':
manager.o(.text+0x86d):
Anyone using 3.3 please let me know about your success or failure with
this port. I was not able to get it to work.
Thanks,
Flinn
On Feb 18, 2004, at 4:56 AM, LOYET Jerome wrote:
See my precedent post.
Subjet: "RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 3.4 & OpenBSD 0.66"
++ Jerome
-Message d'origine-
ask Loyett Jerome, he seems pretty on top of this build.
On Feb 17, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
Are there any success stories involving OpenBSD 3.4 and ClamAV 0.66? Is
there someone who wants to share a package?
---
SF.Net is spon
Do you have digital signature support?
On Feb 11, 2004, at 7:13 PM, Vic Metcalfe wrote:
I actually got it to build. I started over and couldn't duplicate the
same
problem I had before... Sorry to have jumped the gun. Here's how I
made it
work (I'm using bash):
export LDFLAGS=-lpthread
./c
instructions should be about it, anyone let me know if I
forgot something, or if you have anything to add to this.
Regards,
Flinn Mueller
ActiveIntra.net, Inc.
flinn (a.T) activeintra (D.o.T) net
Toll Free: 1-800-640-4876 ext. 251
GnuPG (ID 27AE2CA9)
506B 1794 E240 ECEB 0758 2F90 6943 1
Ditto. My version of clamav-0.65 is running since 22 Dec 03 (last time
I rebooted for security reasons). Before that it was pretty solid as
well.
Regards,
Flinn
On Jan 19, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Roy Morris wrote:
It works fine on Openbsd 3.4 --stable, other then the items th
yes that is the latest, I have yet to play with the latest snaps. i
need to test on 3.4, but I am not ready to deploy 3.4 on my server
(mostly because of the change from a.out to elf).
regards,
flinn
On Jan 19, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Andrea Riela wrote:
http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/.
there is no problem with openbsd's libpthread. the problem has to do
with the way clamav get's built. i would be surprised that you were
able to build it then get an error like that. you don't have gnu
pthreads installed do you? If so remove it, you don't need it. try
the port though, it s
On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:48 PM, jef moskot wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something like this already? Even making accepting a link to a
commercial av's db entr
Merry Christmas, and Yuletide greetings!
Regards,
Flinn
On Dec 24, 2003, at 5:38 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 09:34:05 +1100
Mick Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just like to wish ALL a Merry Christmas. Hope Santa is good to you.
Merry Christmas !
I'm just waiting on a conversat
On Nov 29, 2003, at 5:17 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
There _are_ current issues with thread-based clamd (and thread-based
software in general, as everything (memory, fd's etc)is shared
between threads:
No wonder there are issues with threading in clamd. When I pointed
the author at "Programming wit
I just received a quite a few patches from LOYET Jerome . The most important patch enables Milter. This also
enables bzlib, which I think was a problem with the first version of
the port. Most of the patches are not import, but they get rid of other
warning messages we get on OpenBSD. I do not u
did a binary upgrade on
the machine from 3.1 to 3.3. Over Thanksgiving weekend I should have
time to get a machine running local here to test it out.
Regards,
Flinn
On Nov 25, 2003, at 6:50 PM, Chris Paul wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 23:14, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Please test this latest stable
wrote:
Built fine for me on i386 3.4-stable. I don't know if this would be a
factor, but I'd already built 0.65 from the normal source, so other
packages, like gmp, were already in place.
- Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Flin
As soon as I get a chance I will look into this. That will probably be
Friday night or Saturday.
I think we have seen issues on another 3.4-current machine.
Regards,
Flinn
On Nov 20, 2003, at 8:30 AM, Abdul Rehman Gani wrote:
On 20 Nov 2003, at 3:03 PM, Flinn Mueller wrote:
What version of
What version of OpenBSD are you running?
Regards,
Flinn
On Nov 20, 2003, at 7:35 AM, Abdul Rehman Gani wrote:
On 18 Nov 2003, at 9:14 AM, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Please test this latest stable version (0.65) of clamav stable.
There was a small work around in the Makefile of the port. It seems
I also get this on OpenBSD and bzlib.h is in my include path.
On Nov 19, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lamy wrote:
Roger Koot wrote:
Hi all,
Today I decided it was time to give clamav 0.65 a go.
so I d/l the source tarball, and ran ./configure
everything went fine until configure check the availabili
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Updated Clam Antivirus Stable 0.65 OpenBSD
Port
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Please test this latest stable version (0.65) of clamav stable.
en it might be on your end.
Regards,
Flinn
On Nov 17, 2003, at 5:08 PM, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
I'm trying to make a package out of ClamAV-065 for OpenBSD-3.4. As a
starting point I used the port made by Flinn Mueller
(http://activeintra.net/openbsd/ports/security/clamav.tgz) whereby
Makefil
Anyone else getting crap from clamd? It seems non-responsive here, but
that might be my f-ed up machine. Or it could be a my clamav.conf.
Regards,
Flinn
On Nov 18, 2003, at 2:14 AM, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Please test this latest stable version (0.65) of clamav stable. There
was a small work
Please test this latest stable version (0.65) of clamav stable. There
was a small work around in the Makefile of the port. It seems that the
configure script was not detecting gmp2. I added -L${PREFIX}/lib to
LDFLAGS and -I${PREFIX}/include to CFLAGS, and all seems to work. If
anyone ha
You are missing GMP, install then rebuild with support for it.
On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 10:31 AM, Support ePaxsys/FRWS wrote:
Greetings folks!
Been reading my clam-update.log (since previous posts raised my
curiousity) and noticed:
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 02:15 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
As clamav becomes more and more stable and as snapshots are available
I wonder when the OpenBSD port gets updated? Wouldn't it be nice if
there were a clamav-latest port (for development and testing use) that
fetches a clamav-lates
make sure clamd is running as qscand (or whatever the username of
qmail-scanner is).
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 07:06 AM, David du SERRE-TELMON
wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if it's the right list for this post, if not, take my
apologizes for this message.
I've got some problem for running q
The port maintainer will ask you what clamav.conf variables are set.
That problem has been reported, and we were told it was fixed. I am
running clamav-devel-20030926 on 3.3 and have not had any segfaults
since Sep 21.
Anyone else having this issue still?
Regards,
Flinn
On Wednesday, October
ditto
I am using 20030926, it seems very stable though. I have been slacking
on the obsd port since I am waiting for a stable release.
I wish a stable release would have made it out before cvd
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 05:17 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hey,
I have seen you guys experim
no.
Check line 56 of the default config.
On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Stewart MacLund wrote:
Wouter de Vries said:
ClamAV has a "FixStaleSocket"-directive in the config file, try it.
hm. I don't seem to have that directive as an example in my config
file.
Is it newish?
SUndie...
There is nothing stopping you from doing this.
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 04:32 PM, Stefan Schoeman wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am new to this list but have been using ClamAV with good results
together with MIMEDefang (www.mimedefang.org) and sendmail. MIMEDefang
is
a general purpose perl pr
here is my unofficial port. I can't help you with milter, but handle
that after you get it compiling.
http://activeintra.net/projects/clamav/
Regrards,
Flinn
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 01:33 PM, Eric Zager wrote:
Sorry to ask a question which appears in the archive, but I haven't
been
run a current cvs or snapshot.
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 03:10 PM, Robert Burtelow wrote:
Hello all,
I've been banging my head against the desk for the past two days
trying to figure this one out. I'm running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE with
qmail/qmail-scanner/clamav. Whenever messages are
Is this going into the snap for Oct 9 or is it in today's snap?
Regards,
Flinn
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
So, are we close to a new stable version?
Yeah ! CVS clamd is the most stable version ever.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PR
For the record, I have never tested the milter configuration. ;-)
On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Scott Deacon wrote:
Good day,
I've been trying to implement Flinn Meuller's Clamav Milter (20030926)
packages on OpenBSD 3.3 (stable). I've worked through a number of
issues
but I'm stum
Maybe I can sponsor that ;-)
On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Hey, are you still having issues with this?
I am running 20030926 from my port, and I haven't had a single
segfault
with it.
Unfortunately the race condition with db reloading is still there :(
Best regard
viruses)
Sat Sep 27 02:01:40 2003 -> SelfCheck: Database modification detected.
Forcing reload.
Sat Sep 27 02:01:40 2003 -> SelfCheck: Integrity OK
Sat Sep 27 02:01:40 2003 -> Segmentation fault :-( Bye..
clamav-devel-20030925
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
I still haven't seen
make sure clamav is compiled --with-user=qscand --with-group=qscand (or
whatever you are using for qmail-scanner)
or set the User option in clamav.conf
On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 04:00 AM, greg gede wrote:
does anybody know why do i keep getting the following
error messages in my log??? :
O
Can we sponsor a feature ;-)
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 02:37 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Let me know where to send it. My supervisor has approved a company
donation
but wants to know where it's going and what it'll be used for? (you
know how
There will be a special account for donations for
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 04:49 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
Does the clam
project work off donations
I should be so lucky :-)
I wouldn't mind throwing a few bucks in the pot...
just kind people's free time?
Free time, what's that?
Ditto
Where is the clam project based?
All over the place
, Flinn Mueller wrote:
uncomment Foreground in clamav.conf
Ah, I was worried that was it. When I do this on FreeBSD 4.8 with the
latest build from the port's tree it appears to startup properly, stay
in
foreground, but doesn't appear to actually function. (Doesn't accept
connection
uncomment Foreground in clamav.conf
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 02:12 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
I saw mention on the list of a new option to clamd to allow it to run
in
the foreground so it could run under a suprivisor rather than forking
itself into the background. Has this been done
It will become official once we can get a stable release. As you
probably know we don't like unstable ports. I attempted to get .60
into the ports tree, but it became obviously unstable within days of
the release. Despite the fact that this port is not official, it is
just as functional as a
n detected.
Forcing reload.
Sat Sep 27 02:01:40 2003 -> SelfCheck: Integrity OK
Sat Sep 27 02:01:40 2003 -> Segmentation fault :-( Bye..
clamav-devel-20030925
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
I still haven't seen this problem yet.
Do you want to run freshclam under deamontools? I have a pat
Vries wrote:
I still get segmentation faults when the virii db is updated
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Update (09/27/2003)
Updated to work with 20030926. I actually added clamav-milter
support to the milter flavor ;)
Fixed the docs install notice
Also added the ability to change the clamav user/group i
Update (09/27/2003)
Updated to work with 20030926. I actually added clamav-milter support
to the milter flavor ;)
Fixed the docs install notice
Also added the ability to change the clamav user/group in one place
instead of hardcoding: _clamd
I do not use sendmail so I do not test milter, it
Compile the unofficial port, it has all necessary patches to compile
under OpenBSD.
http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/
The port will use whatever version of unrar you have in your tree.
The current clamav binary packages are actually depending on 2.50 if I
remember correctly, which is
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 12:13 AM, Philip Mak wrote:
When I scan a MIME message using ClamAV, can I just feed the raw
message into ClamAV, or do I have to use ripmime first to extract the
individual attachments into files first?
No you don't have to use ripmime.
I've tested a virus mess
In my next port I will release with variables (CLAMUSER and CLAMGROUP )
sepcifically for users to set. The reason you have to chown a few
things is because the install script has _clamd hardcoded into it.
This will also change to CLAMUSER and CLAMGROUP.
Regards,
Flinn
On Tuesday, September 16
I had issues today using (20030921) on 3.3 i386. Clamd became
unresponsive, and I had to kill the process. I also had issues with
freshclam crashing, which led to me patching freshclam so that it will
run under daemontools. We are promised a a stable release by the end
of September, so hopef
I'm getting this message a lot
LibClamAV Warning: Unsupported multipart format `appledouble'
Any plan on supporting this type of format?
Regards,
Flinn
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.c
trashscan didn't really work for me either. I think it was also due to
metamail. I was running almost that exact configuration
(procmail->trashscan->clamscan->spamassassin->vmailmgr) , and dumped it
in favor of qmail-scanner.
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 01:25 AM, Mike Silbersack wrot
Is the new qmail-queue setuid?
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 03:15 PM, Christian Ista wrote:
Hello,
I have a server (Redhat 7.1).
I installed that :
- clamav
- Qmail-queue
- Qmail-scanner
- some perl module
All these elements are compiled and installed, I didn't have any
problem.
When I
Does anyone have a working procmail filter for ripping the offending
virus out then sending the original message?
I tried trashscan and had several problems with it. Particularly it
was reassembling a message and pretty much destroying the 'From:'
header.
My current filter is blocking the off
dard) disabled under NetBSD?
Are threre any known problems with the clamd under NetBSD?
regards
oliver
Am Mit, 2003-09-10 um 13.39 schrieb Flinn Mueller:
Didn't know they were that different... I always was under the
impression (because I never had to deal with it) pth is a drop in
posix thre
I believe this is also happening to Wouter running Amavis. He
described a crash after database reloading, and sometimes a loop with:
Wed Sep 10 19:23:48 2003 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
Wed Sep 10 19:23:48 2003 -> SelfCheck: Integrity OK
Please update and tell us if it happens again.
Rega
The new port 20030909? Clamd, clamdscan, or clamscan? With an error
message? What were you scanning?
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 02:40 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
I actually just upgraded to devel-20030909. The snapshot kept crashing
:(
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Anyone else
Anyone else having issues compiling 20030908 on OpenBSD 3.3?
Regards,
Flinn
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Clamav-users mailing lis
#x27;t gnu-pth2 work under NetBSD for this purpose?
How should this work? Both of this implementations use different
primitives, structures and definitions. For example there is no
pthread_mutex_t definition in pth.h.
regards
oliver
Am Mit, 2003-09-10 um 00.04 schrieb Flinn Mueller:
Doesn'
ClamAntiVirus
Update (09/09/2003)
I've updated the devel port to 20030909. Many thanks for everyone who sent feedback. I got lots of input about milter and ripmime, but in the end went with a milter flavor. If I get the time to screw around with ripmime, I might make that available as a flavor
Doesn't gnu-pth2 work under NetBSD for this purpose?
Regards,
Flinn
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Oliver Egginger wrote:
Hello,
I need posix thread support under NetBSD, cause the clamd (an open
source virus scanner) needs pthreads. I tempted to use the mit-pthread
pachage from pk
what are your configure options?
should need any if I remember correctly.
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:59 AM, Flinn Mueller wrote:
What version of OS X?
10.2.6. This happens with our without pthreads enabled, if that helps
What version of OS X?
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 02:31 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile clamv 0.60 on Mac OS X, but am getting this
error:
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _strcasecmp
/Users/shupp/Desktop/clamav-0.60/libclamav/.libs/
libclamav.dylib(strc.lo
/21/2003)
> I've updated 0.60 and 20030720 with a small minor bug fix. Many
thanks
> for everyone who sent feedback.
>
> clamav tested on 3.3 i386
>
> I've also attached the latest snapshot 20030720
> clamav-devel tested on 3.3 i386
>
> Porthome:
> http://activeintr
Please test for 3.3-current. It builds and runs fine on 3.1
I've updated 0.60 with some various bug fixes. Many thanks for
everyone who sent feedback. I've update the latest snapshot
(20030719)
port.
Changes
After many requests I finally put a default clamav.conf in
{SYSCONFDIR}.
Updated mirror
I have update the port for the -0.60 port for OpenBSD.
Please test.
http://activeintra.net/openbsd/article.php?id=5
clamav-snapshot.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
clamav.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Regards,
Flinn
-
I made a binary package available. Please test. I'm looking into
adding milter support, anyone using sendmail?
http://activeintra.net/openbsd/article.php?id=5
Attachment:
clamav-snapshot.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Regards,
Flinn
I have a patch to ltmain.sh as a part of my OpenBSD port that I would
like to see get into the main src tree, but I need to test them on
other BSD systems to ensure they don't break. I am pretty sure that
FreeBSD does not even use ltmain.sh included with clam. I believe
FreeBSD's port has USE_LIB
Yeah, I know.
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 01:11 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hey,
Too bad there's already a new snapshot with a few important bug fixes
:)
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Finally I got the time to finish... Please test.
--
Clam AntiVirus is an anti-virus toolkit for UNIX
Finally I got the time to finish... Please test.
--
Clam AntiVirus is an anti-virus toolkit for UNIX. The main purpose of
this software is the integration with mail servers (attachment
scanning). The package provides a flexible and scalable multi-threaded
daemon, a command line scanner, and a
Maybe a quarantine program might handle it better. Using the flag not
to move the file, but using the flag to call a program to move the
file. ie. call a shell script and pass variables like filename and
filepath. This would allow us to call a customized script to handle
quarantines.
Regard
Me too, hopefully I can get it committed by 3.4
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 08:09 AM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
This is very good news to hear indeed! I am really looking forward to
the new stable version.
Wouter
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Tomasz Kojm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzon
could gnu pth work on netbsd for clamd's purposes?
Regards,
Flinn
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 06:22 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Run the command
`which clamd` - it will find where the binary was installed ;-)
Hehe, it won't because clamd building is disabled on NetBSD.
Best regards,
Tomasz Ko
Ok, all is well with this port I hear. Big thanks to Ed Vázquez for pointing
out home directory conventions on 3.3, and making my life easier by sending
me his modifications ;) Again I haven't tested it, please let me know if it
works for everyone.
I'll try and get a 3.1 port out this week. Since
This is not the job of Clamav. I think you could write a script of
your own to bounce messages if they are infected.
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:44 PM, Stephen White wrote:
Original Message
From Raymond Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, 09 Jun 2003, 16:56
I am trying to see
I'd also love to see a clamav project on SF. I want to see CVS access
too.
Regards,
Flinn
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 10:27 AM, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
At 03:48 AM 6/9/2003, Ahmad Masood Shah wrote:
There was problem in clamv system. Now they have recoverd ...
updating is working now..
[ ..
I'm sending this out to everyone that I _think_ is concerned about the
OpenBSD port.
Someone please test this port of 20030605 on OpenBSD. I have not tested it
extensively,
but libclamav clamscan, and clamd both now compile with -pthread ( which is
what the
problem was ). So please compile and r
Flinn
- Original Message -
From: "marrandy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] OpenBSD v3.3 - tgz install (no port)
> On Saturday 31 May 2003 10:14 pm, Flinn Mueller wrote:
> > I'
I'm working on it...
- Original Message -
From: "marrandy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: [clamav-users] OpenBSD v3.3 - tgz install (no port)
> Hello.
>
> Just tried the latest snapshot and the stable release. Bioth halt durin
George Szekely wrote:
"use_netinfo="yes"
have_pthreads="no"
echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: Darwin detected. Disabling thread
support." >&5
echo "${ECHO_T}Darwin detected. Disabling thread support." >&6
;;
"
I've flipped "no" to "yes" and it did compile and install, but the question
I scanned this with NAV, and it also turns up nothing...
Fajar Arief Nugraha wrote:
Hi,
I'm attaching a zip file (password : "virus") containing a virus
attachment (joke.exe) which clamav missed during scanning.
I believe the virus is "Snow White" or "WORM_LOVGATE.B"
Strangely enough, Yahoo's S
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
I don't have access and am not familiar with OpenBSD, so I hope Flinn will
create a patch for that -lc_r problem ;)
As promissed, here it is
3.3 systems do not require -lc_r
3.1 systems do
patches and ports attached for 3.1, and 3.3
I have not tested the 3.3 port or patchbut
Just got it (20030522) running with threads on OpenBSD 3.1. I need to
do more testing, and get it running on 3.3.
Patch coming soon...
Regards,
Flinn
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 10:46 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
The latest snapshot seems to be very stable under BSD. Ken McKittrick
has
provided me
I am having the same issues on OpenBSD 3.1 that I had with the previous
snaps.
/usr/libexec/ld.so: Undefined symbol "_pthread_self" called from
clamscan:/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.2 at 0x400332d8
I haven't tried it on OpenBSD 3.3 yet, but I expect the same results.
Regards,
Flinn'
Tomasz Koj
This is fixed in my unnofficial port.
http://www.activeintra.net/openbsd/article.php?id=5
Mark Anderson wrote:
I've just installed the latest clamav source on an OpenBSD 3.2
but receive the following error when I try the test thats
mentioned in the documentation.
$ clamscan -r -l scan.txt ../c
Did you install pth-2 on your own or from ports? I see 1.4.1 in the
current tree.
That may be the key.
20030317 may have been the last working snapshot before the breakage on
my systems
Regards,
Flinn
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 02:20 PM, Ed Vazquez wrote:
Well, this was the case with both
The problem with changing -pthread to -lpthread is that -pthread is
supposed to do some extra things that -lpthread (it currently does not
do anything extra, but may in the future I believe).
I had similar success changing the configure to -lpthread, but if I
remember correctly this broke in re
A real fix is the patch included in the port.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 04:00 AM, Kim Nielsen wrote:
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 09:45, Flinn Mueller wrote:
No
I fixed this with a ./configure without threads.
/Kim
-
To
Well, there are a few small problems with it that I have not fixed as
of yet. I was hoping a new stable release would soon grace us with
it's presence so that I could update my port.
I have had thread issues with recent snapshots, but have not had the
time to really look into it.
Anyways, I'l
No
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 03:40 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Download my port:
http://activeintra.net/openbsd/article.php?id=5
There is one for .54 on 3.3 in the center of the page.
Is it an official port ?
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\..
Download my port:
http://activeintra.net/openbsd/article.php?id=5
There is one for .54 on 3.3 in the center of the page.
OpenBSD does not use -lc_r anymore...hence the breakage.
Regards,
Flinn
On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 07:33 AM, Kim Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems when compiling versi
97 matches
Mail list logo
