Re: [Clamav-users] Re: False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]

Sven Strickroth wrote: > Please read > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.virusdb/1935 Ah, thank you very much. Didn't remeber the results get published. I'll look into the newsgroup in future. lg, daniel ___ http://lurker.clam

[Clamav-users] False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]

ClamAV wrote: > Dear ClamAV user, > The following submissions have been processed and published: > - 504853 The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should I do now? Submit it again? I know the DB people hav

[Clamav-users] pklite executables?

Hej, does somebody know how PKLite[0] affects Windows executables? Does it affect virus scanning, with ClamAV i.e.? Is a free linux unpacker out there? I couldn't google one. (And, btw., how's that with lzexe?) TIA for any information. lg, daniel [0] http://tinyurl.com/dl43v (redirects to

Re: [Clamav-users] Can phishing be considered one kind of spam ?

Joanna Roman wrote: > Can phishing be considered one kind of spam ? Sure it can! HTH, HAND, daniel ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] M$ preparing AV software ?

Freddie Cash wrote: What would be nicer, though, is if MS would fix the security model in the base OS that allows for these things to spread so easily, instead of adding more and more layers of bandaids on top. You can't easily put security improvments in a box and sell them. And that's what's sti

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.82 out?

Brian Morrison wrote: Oh please no, the whole point of the announcement list is so that important stuff doesn't get lost in the noise! So what? Would be great if announcements could be CCed to clamav-users, so ppl here don't have to subscribe to the announcement list too. lg, daniel __

[Clamav-users] support for external unpackers

Hej, I don't know whether this has been discussed allready, I can't find it in the ML archive at least. What do you people think about support for external unpackers in clamd? I know I can use them with clamscan, so why not within clamd too? I think this would be a great feature, as I (and others t

Re: [Clamav-users] sober

pgomez wrote: I am still getting the w32.sober.I through my clam defense system. I keep my Exchange box behind Linux to keep it from getting hammered to much, but Norton on the Exchange box is catching this virus. Hmm, is it *really* catching the virus? I'm getting lots of *emtpy* E-Mail attachment

Re: [Clamav-users] Leak on Linux 2.4

Trog wrote: The problem is that clamd is using nearly twice as much memory as it was a minute before... It uses memory to scan files, especially to scan email messages. An email message could make the memory usage jump. I agree it would jump up and down of course, maybe increasing over the time w

Re: [Clamav-users] Leak on Linux 2.4

Roman Suzi wrote: I am not sure why do you worry. Can't see anything unusual. So you say it's usual, that clamd uses 14M of memory for about one day, and then suddenly jumps to 27M? Weird. The number of clamd processes is dynamic except for two watchdogs. That's not the problem. I see I wasn't clea

[Clamav-users] Leak on Linux 2.4

Hej, JFYI: I'm running ClamAV 0.75.1 as a daemon on one of my Linux 2.4.26 boxes, and first I'd like to state, that it's _way_ better than 0.65, I tried some time ago. Great job. I'm logging process statistics regularly, and discoverd this strange behaviour in my "ps aux" log: ("ps aux|grep clamd",