Re: [Clamav-users] Massive problems clamav-0.90.x under Solaris 10

2007-03-15 Thread Alex Moore
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at > the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it may be a > worthwhile thing to have a semaphore available as a socket query or > as

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-14 Thread Alex Moore
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:34:14 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ScanArchive = yes > ArchiveMaxFileSize = 0 > ArchiveMaxRecursion = 8 > ArchiveMaxFiles = 1000 > ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio = 250 > ArchiveLimitMemoryUsage = no > ArchiveBlockEncrypted = no > ArchiveBlockMax = yes > >

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-14 Thread Alex Moore
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:54:12 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My systems handle about 1 million messages/week and none have > suffered a crashed clamd since I installed a self-built version > 0.90.1. I did not enable experimental, and I don't use scripted > updates. My milter is

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-14 Thread Alex Moore
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:01:06 +0200 (SAST) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am experiencing the same problems. > > We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming > mail on our domains. These servers are generally very busy. No experimental code here. This

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-08 Thread Alex Moore
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:02:40 + (GMT) Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote: > ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume > > We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing > over 250K messages a day and have seen absolutely

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-08 Thread Alex Moore
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:15:54 -0800 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Moore wrote: > > Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. > > The daemon had been running for several days. The mail server only > > handles around 500

[Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-07 Thread Alex Moore
Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. The daemon had been running for several days. The mail server only handles around 500 messages/day. So far, I have no clue. I have been running clamav for a few years now and have not seen this before. At this time, I have reve

Re: [Clamav-users] Solaris 10 clamav 0.88: Digital signature verification error

2006-03-16 Thread Alex Moore
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:28:51 -0500 Pierre Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend to compile lots more stuff and so far i put it all in /opt. > Why is that a problem? I don't intend to share it nor do i intend to > install precompiled packages. It is not a problem. Just my experience ta

Re: [Clamav-users] Solaris 10 clamav 0.88: Digital signature verification error

2006-03-15 Thread Alex Moore
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:23:08 -0500 Pierre Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I compiled gmp like this: > CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc CFLAGS="-fast -xarch=amd64" ./configure > --prefix=/opt/gmp-4.1.4 Did 'make check' pass all tests with -fast? > > and clamav like this: > CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/gmp/inclu

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.87.1 / SunOS 5.8: goes nuts when sent SIGHUP

2005-11-08 Thread Alex Moore
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:06:57 -0800 "Brian C. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found the problem, but I am not sure why it is a problem. I > add "<&-" to the end of all services that I start to keep ssh from > hanging on open file descriptors. This makes clamav unhappy (though > not anyth