[clamav-users] SOLVED Re: Fri Apr 12 08:46:13 2019 -> !Verification: Malformed database

Hi All, Just an FYI thatclamav was linking to libz.so.1.1.4 and upgrading to libz.so.1.2.11 resolved the issue with being unable to verify updates. Might need to be a check for a minimum zlip version though I don't have input which version specifically demonstrates the issue. Also note that --wi

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

I do still have an interest in dropping the Phish.Phishing.REPHISH signatures. I will look into dropping these as well. We identified the issue causing the PhishTank and Phish signatures to run slowly and how to make them run quickly, but have yet to decide whether or not to reintroduce the sig

Re: [clamav-users] VirusEvent notification

Yogesh, I don’t like to make specific promises in public regarding release dates or new features. However, we are expecting this to be ready for the 0.102.0 release, which is planned to go into beta anywhere from late June to early August. Regards, Micah From: Yogesh Date: Tuesday, April

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

Gotcha. Those were slowing the scans down more than the 3000-someodd PhishTank sigs the last time I tested (Apr 9th). daily_Phish.ldb Time: 1.612 sec (0 m 1 s) daily_Phishtank.ldb Time: 0.146 sec (0 m 0 s) 2515 daily_Phish.ldb 3516 daily_Phishtank.ldb On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

There are still 2515 "Phish.Phishing.REPHISH_ID_" signatures in daily.ldb -Al- > On Apr 17, 2019, at 03:36, Maarten Broekman > wrote: > > Are the "Phish" REPHISH signatures still in the daily or were they removed as > well? Those were causing part of the

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

Are the "Phish" REPHISH signatures still in the daily or were they removed as well? Those were causing part of the issue. --Maarten On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:24 AM Al Varnell via clamav-users < clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote: > An additional 3968 Phishtank.Phishing.PHISH_ID_??? signat

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

An additional 3968 Phishtank.Phishing.PHISH_ID_??? signatures were dropped by daily-25417 on 12 April, and I can't seem to locate any more. -Al- > On Apr 17, 2019, at 02:01, Mark Allan via clamav-users > wrote: > > Hi Micah, > > Sorry to pester you, but have you any update on when the re

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

Hi Micah, Sorry to pester you, but have you any update on when the remaining Phishtank signatures will be getting removed? It would be really great to get scan times properly back to normal. Best regards Mark On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 16:32, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > Mark, > > > Yes, the pl