Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: [External] Re: Scan very slow

2019-04-06 Thread Tim Hawkins
That was the point i was trying to make, these sigs are more applicable to people wishing to scan email communication (wether file based or via a plugin), if you are not dealing with email on your servers then tbey reperesent an unnessacary overhead. Our servers scan individual files uploaded

Re: [clamav-users] Procedure for Correct Action

2019-04-06 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Robert F. Poe wrote: I need clarification for the proper action to take after finding viruses and malware. I'll try not to be misled by your questions. I use ClamAv Virus Scanner (or Clamscan) to scan my server on a weekly basis. I have the Virus Scanner via m

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav for educational institutions ?

2019-04-06 Thread Scott Kitterman via clamav-users
On Saturday, April 06, 2019 04:51:16 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:12, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users > >> wrote: The unrar stuff is still free to > >> use. > >> > >> Due to modification restrictions Debian splits it off into the unofficial > >> non-free repository

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

2019-04-06 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
Given that the PhishTank signatures, specifically, have been causing the performance issues, no. It's not unreasonable to want to pull them, and only them, out. Having them in a separate db file would be highly beneficial to those of us that don't want or need them at all. Barring that, having a co

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav for educational institutions ?

2019-04-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.04.19 00:21, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote: Correct. Which is why we recommend people compile from source for full functionality. and which functionality is missing in binary form? On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:12, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote: The unrar stuff is stil

Re: [clamav-users] [External] Re: Scan very slow

2019-04-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 05.04.19 22:05, Tim Hawkins wrote: Does clamav partition the database so that signatures that are mainly associated with email scanning can be dropped out for folks only needing filesystems scans, none of our systems use email, and we dont make use of the mailer extension. how do you ima

Re: [clamav-users] Malformed pattern daily.ldb version 25410

2019-04-06 Thread David Shrimpton via clamav-users
Is the failing machine running out of memory running engine = cl_engine_new() David Shrimpton ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive Clam

Re: [clamav-users] Malformed pattern daily.ldb version 25410

2019-04-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail via clamav-users
On 4/5/2019 9:40 PM, David Shrimpton via clamav-users wrote: > This appears to be a different problem than the sigtool --list problem on > daily Thanks for the impressive list of debug ideas.  Whatever this is, it's a bug in clamav or an underlying library.  The machine with the issue is a hodgep