On 05/15/2012 12:26 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> We could talk to clamd using TCP/IP, but since the clamd protocol doesn't
> seem to be clearly documented, that would involve reverse engineering
> clamdscan and rewriting it.
The protocol is described in: man 8 clamd
--Edwin
__
On 05/14/2012 12:18 PM, Teresa K. Fowler wrote:
[snip]
I do hope I have clarified things for you, if not just ignore this posting
except for the etiquette of not top posting.
--
Jim Preston
Dear Jim Preston, You have explained everything beautifully, clearly even
for me, a right-brain writer,
On 14/05/2012 20:57, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On May 14, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Simon Hobson wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
What if WE made an AV plugin DLL to link our software with libclamav?
If your software license isn't GPL-miscible, then you should not redistribute
the combination of your software
On May 14, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> OK, I know this will probably have come up over and over, but I couldn't find
> anything in the archives.
>
> We produce a commercial mail server (not GPLed) which has a defined DLL
> interface to allow people to create plugins to integrate with
On May 14, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
>>> What if WE made an AV plugin DLL to link our software with libclamav?
>>
>> If your software license isn't GPL-miscible, then you should not
>> redistribute the combination of your software, the plugin, and ClamAV.
>
>
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> What if WE made an AV plugin DLL to link our software with libclamav?
If your software license isn't GPL-miscible, then you should not
redistribute the combination of your software, the plugin, and
ClamAV.
Isn't this a case where the component they've linked with (in
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Jim Preston
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 2:39 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] From a newbie: ClamAV scans shut down Google
Chrome
On 05/13/2012 03:00
On May 14, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> We produce a commercial mail server (not GPLed) which has a defined DLL
> interface to allow people to create plugins to integrate with virus scanners
> (I'll call that an 'AV plugin DLL'). It's not specifically designed for
> ClamAV, but for any
On 05/14/12 11:55, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> If we made our software link directly with libclamav, then, as far as I
> can see we'd need to GPL our software, which isn't desirable
Yup.
> What if another person made an AV plugin DLL to link our software with
> libclamav? I presume that by doing so,
OK, I know this will probably have come up over and over, but I couldn't
find anything in the archives.
We produce a commercial mail server (not GPLed) which has a defined DLL
interface to allow people to create plugins to integrate with virus
scanners (I'll call that an 'AV plugin DLL'). It's
10 matches
Mail list logo
