Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 21:33, Luca Gibelli a écrit :
> Hello Erwan,
>
> > > What? If websites are a requirement for ClamAV then this project is
> > > doomed. I don't see our NOC surfin the interwebz as part of the job.
> > > (Sarcasm alert).
> >
> > Websites do not require signing an illegal c
Hello Erwan,
> > What? If websites are a requirement for ClamAV then this project is doomed.
> > I don't see our NOC surfin the interwebz as part of the job.
> > (Sarcasm alert).
> Websites do not require signing an illegal contract with a third-party.
> (And twitter contract IS illegal with rega
Hello George,
> Please say that this is NOT happening, I really don't want to re-engineer
> a solution because someone decides they like a social media tool for
> support. It was hard enough getting the email lists allowed after 3 years
> on my internal mail vs. home email.
It's not a require
Le Tue 19/07/2011, Jan-Pieter Cornet disait
> On 2011 Jul 19, at 17:20 , Luca Gibelli wrote:
> > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>
> What? If websites are a requirement for ClamAV then this project is doomed. I
> don't see our NOC surfin the interwebz as part of the job.
>
> (Sarcasm alert).
W
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:18:47 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 4:02 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, if twitter is a requirement for using ClamAV then
>> this project is doomed. I don't see our 'business' endorsing our NOC
>> playing with twitter as part of the job.
>
> Th
On 7/19/2011 4:02 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> In my opinion, if twitter is a requirement for using ClamAV then
> this project is doomed. I don't see our 'business' endorsing our NOC
> playing with twitter as part of the job.
There is ZERO chance of that getting allowed here. If this becomes a
At 9:39 PM +0300 7/19/2011, Török Edwin wrote:
What does 'host -t TXT current.cvd.clamav.net'
output? Does it say :13334: or :1:?
Also whats the TTL on it? Should be something
like 15m, if larger your DNS server might be
caching these entries longer than its supposed
to.
It was a few h