On 06/17/2010 02:53 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
> On 6/16/10 6:24 PM, Mark Allan at markjal...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
>
>> On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:26 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
> This is on a PowerPC Macintosh run
On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:26 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
This is on a PowerPC Macintosh runing OS X 10.5.8 and ClamAV 0.96.1.
Are you sure it is 0.96.1? Did you restart clamd after the upgrade?
Yes, it's 0.96.1. Even w
On 6/16/10 6:24 PM, Mark Allan at markjal...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:26 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
>> On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
This is on a PowerPC Macintosh runing OS X 10.5.8 and ClamAV 0.96.1.
>>>
>>> Are you
> Thanks, I've started a new scan from / with
>
> clamscan -ir --exclude-dir=^/sys --exclude-dir=^/dev
> --exclude-dir=^/proc --detect-pua=yes --scan-mail=no --max-
> filesize=5M
> --log=/var/log/clamav/scanlog.log
Just wanted to report (for anyone searching for this info later) that
this command
On 16 Jun 2010, at 10:26 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
This is on a PowerPC Macintosh runing OS X 10.5.8 and ClamAV 0.96.1.
Are you sure it is 0.96.1? Did you restart clamd after the upgrade?
Yes, it's 0.96.1. Even w
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Are you running ClamXAv or ...?
I have no idea what ClamXAV is. I'm talking about ClamAV built from
source.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, T?r?k Edwin wrote:
On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
Just had my hourly run of freshclam and ClamAV promptly blew up.
Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jun 16 15:19:00 2010
Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
ma
Are you running ClamXAv or ...?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On 06/16/2010 11:58 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
> Just had my hourly run of freshclam and ClamAV promptly blew up.
>
> Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Jun 16 15:19:00 2010
> Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
> main.cld is up to date (version: 5
I probably didn't mention it, indeed ; the OS I use is Debian. And I can't
add RAM in any way. It worked perfectly with the former version, that's why
I asked this question here.
Regards.
2010/6/16 Chuck Swiger
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > I will try it and I'll tell
Just had my hourly run of freshclam and ClamAV promptly blew up.
Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jun 16 15:19:00 2010
Jun 16 15:19:00 albion freshclam[85484]:
main.cld is up to date (version: 52, sigs: 704727, f-level: 44, builder:
sven)
Jun 16
On Jun 16, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> I will try it and I'll tell you. About RAM, I didn't explain well. I meant,
> how to do to make clamav use more RAM than swap ; i.e. how to reserve RAM to
> clamav in order to avoid swap.
While you didn't mention which OS you are using (or I forg
I will try it and I'll tell you. About RAM, I didn't explain well. I meant,
how to do to make clamav use more RAM than swap ; i.e. how to reserve RAM to
clamav in order to avoid swap.
2010/6/16 Török Edwin
> On 06/16/2010 07:47 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > I retried to apply the patch. As I thoug
On 06/16/2010 07:47 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> I retried to apply the patch. As I thought, I didn't apply it well and there
> were no free() at all. So, it was fast, but after several reload, my memory
> was down. I applied it correctly and unhappily, it doesn't really change the
> time taken for a
I retried to apply the patch. As I thought, I didn't apply it well and there
were no free() at all. So, it was fast, but after several reload, my memory
was down. I applied it correctly and unhappily, it doesn't really change the
time taken for a reload. Maybe the solution would be in memory usage
15 matches
Mail list logo
