On 04/18/2010 12:14 AM, jef moskot wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Is g++ the same version too (i.e. does g++ -v shows 4.2.1 too?).
Yep, same deal:
# g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
For the record, no checks failed, although some were skipped:
make check-TEST
On 4/17/10 9:03 PM, Jim Preston wrote:
I whole heartedly agree Dan. However I have been slandered today being
called arrogant and ignorant, so what do I know?
Yutz on the left, mench on the right. This EOL process has been a test. It was a
simple test to separate yutz from mench. If you faile
Dan wrote:
At 2:30 PM -0700 4/17/2010, Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Yea, I agree, the Clam team probably could have done things better.
But would more announcements or warnings have really made a
difference? Why would the people, that regularly ignore the
Freshclam war
At 2:30 PM -0700 4/17/2010, Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Yea, I agree, the Clam team probably could have done things better.
But would more announcements or warnings have really made a
difference? Why would the people, that regularly ignore the
Freshclam warnings, pay a
Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Those two lines look fairly clear to me. Essentially they're telling
you to get moving, get the update onto your to-be-done list. This
is, of course, re-enforced by the repeated EOL announcements on
Clam-announce.
I can think of two othe
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> SpamAssassin works already, but what must I do if I like to use ClamAV
> over network with 4-12 scanning machines?.
Hi Michelle,
a definite answer would require a better knowledge about your
environment. Also I'm not a courier-mta user.
However here are some generic sug
> Christian Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
>> Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to
>> use
>> it. I got this error:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> please open a ticket at http://bugs.clamav.net
> Just
Si St wrote:
> Whats the difference between:
> clamav-0.96rc1-19.1.i586.rpm
> and:
> clamav-0.96-27.1.i586.rpm
> ?
The RC is a release canditate package. It was issued before the final
0.96 release (the non-RC package).
> I am thinking of the "RC" specification of the package.
> Which one should
Christian Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
> Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to use
> it. I got this error:
Hi Christian,
please open a ticket at http://bugs.clamav.net
Just copy/paste the i
Hi list,
As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to use
it. I got this error:
# /usr/sbin/clamd
LibClamAV debug: Initialized 0.96 engine
LibClamAV debug: Initializing phishcheck module
LibClamAV d
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Those two lines look fairly clear to me. Essentially they're
telling you to get moving, get the update onto your to-be-done
list. This is, of course, re-enforced by the repeated EOL
announcements on Clam-announce.
I can think of two other ways this could h
Whats the difference between:
clamav-0.96rc1-19.1.i586.rpm
and:
clamav-0.96-27.1.i586.rpm
?
I am thinking of the "RC" specification of the package.
Which one should I choose for my SLED_10_SP3?
I have usually installed and updated the rpms without the RC
specification, but by a coincidence I chos
At 02:03 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
Ralf Quint wrote:
How can people trust any Open Source software if someone else
decides at will which operational systems are being shut down,
which services are being interrupted.
By configuring your systems to be tolerant of such failures of
softwa
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jim Preston wrote:
...snip..
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently causes
browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business site, Should
this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your examp
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Is g++ the same version too (i.e. does g++ -v shows 4.2.1 too?).
Yep, same deal:
# g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
For the record, no checks failed, although some were skipped:
make check-TESTS
PASS: check_clamav
PASS: check_freshcla
At 9:39 PM +0100 4/17/2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
Dan wrote:
So keeping up to date has it's own risks - hence why many people
take the attitude of "if it aint broke, don't fix it".
But being a YEAR out of date?
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Like I said, there ARE legitimate reason
lists wrote:
> Anything else I can help you with?
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
--
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
___
Help us build a comprehen
Ralf Quint wrote:
At 01:14 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a
malicious act just that their system can not handle the signature
update that was sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened
OR configur
Simon Hobson wrote:
Jim Preston wrote:
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently
causes browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business
site, Should this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your example, that was a DOS attack and is illegal.
Jim Preston wrote:
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently
causes browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business
site, Should this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your example, that was a DOS attack and is illegal.
Microsoft updates ha
Dan wrote:
So keeping up to date has it's own risks - hence why many people
take the attitude of "if it aint broke, don't fix it".
But being a YEAR out of date?
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Like I said, there ARE legitimate reasons for not always updating
every bit of software
At 01:14 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a
malicious act just that their system can not handle the signature
update that was sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened
OR configure their systems to
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:14 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK un
Simon Hobson wrote:
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail. H
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:14 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> lists wrote:
> > Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
> > this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
> > kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
> >
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail. He
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail. Here
we have two
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
You say you have mailinglists and customers called you?
No. I was speaking about a couple of fellows who consulted me because the
systems they assemble and sell (which are some kind of SuSE-based mailing
and faxing systems) broke and they weren't immediately able
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
> ... omissis ...
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:56:38PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
Fine. You filed your request. Now the maillist admins will decide if I was
runting, there. And will take action if needed.
Ok?
___
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:53:49PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
> Would you please show me the 50 messages you speak about?
>
> Thanks.
I see off hand:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:12:15PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
On F
> Can the listmoms please throttle or remove this guy? This is roughly
> 50
> messages containing the same rant over the last several days. There is
> no argument that needs to be spread over that much email and waste that
> much of everyone's time.
Would you please show me the 50 messages you s
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
> I'm still waiting for you to show something, moron.
Can the listmoms please throttle or remove this guy? This is roughly 50
messages containing the same rant over the last several days. There is
no argument that needs to be sp
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I do not want to be you customer after reading your messages here
in this Mailinglsts, because I show, you have not a singel clue
about importance of software parts...
I'm still waiting for you to show something, moron.
Giampaolo
Good Morning Giamp
At 2:14 PM +0100 4/16/2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
I hope that by now you may be realising that many people quite
legitimately did not know anything until things broke this morning.
We did not have 6 months notice - our servers "just broke".
I'm sorry, did I miss something? This should be a non-
On 04/17/2010 07:25 PM, jef moskot wrote:
Hi, all.
I was on vacation for a bit and then wanted to wait for the EOL storm to
blow over. I never actually got any response to my original question,
which got sidetracked by a discussion of the FreeBSD port system.
At any rate, the original environme
Hi, all.
I was on vacation for a bit and then wanted to wait for the EOL storm to
blow over. I never actually got any response to my original question,
which got sidetracked by a discussion of the FreeBSD port system.
At any rate, the original environment still applies: FreeBSD 7.1/amd64
wi
On 04/17/2010 06:14 PM, neidorff wrote:
On 4/17/10, neidorff wrote:
On 4/17/10, Török Edwin wrote:
On 04/17/2010 05:12 PM, neidorff wrote:
Help, please.
My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
(qmail from and upgraded from qmailrocks) for years without t
On 4/17/10, neidorff wrote:
>
> On 4/17/10, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> On 04/17/2010 05:12 PM, neidorff wrote:
>>
>>> Help, please.
>>>
>>> My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
>>> (qmail from and upgraded from qmailrocks) for years without trouble. Now
>>> in
>
Hello ClamAV experts,
I run 4 dedicated Sun Fire X4100M2 (Dual CPU, Quad-Core, 16 GByte of
memory) as courier-mta-proxy with ClamAV and SpamAssassin but the
machines sucking to much energy.
Now I want to use some smaller networked machines which are "Marvell
Kirkwood MV78200" with
On 4/17/10, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 04/17/2010 05:12 PM, neidorff wrote:
>
>> Help, please.
>>
>> My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
>> (qmail from and upgraded from qmailrocks) for years without trouble. Now
>> in
>> the position of having to install new c
Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Am 2010-04-16 20:25:55, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> The way the clamav team managed this case hits the open software community
> as a whole, being the ClamAV project a well-known member of that community.
No, -- it hit a minority of ignorants!
Thanks, Greetings
On 04/17/2010 05:12 PM, neidorff wrote:
Help, please.
My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
(qmail from and upgraded from qmailrocks) for years without trouble. Now in
the position of having to install new clamav. Followed the
instructions--uninstalled old c
Help, please.
My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
(qmail from and upgraded from qmailrocks) for years without trouble. Now in
the position of having to install new clamav. Followed the
instructions--uninstalled old clamav. Now building new. (upgraded packa
> Obviously neither side of the discussion can be convinced. It would
> possibly be a good idea to through in some more general thoughts about
> GPL'ed software.
> If I understood RMS' basic intention right he is all for the freedom of
> the _user_. This basically means no software vendor or suppli
> Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Hello Michelle,
> It depends on what youmean with "five small companies".
>
> Here I have a bunch of such small companies with 3-5 employees...
> where
> I maintain the Intranet-Server. And since they are All-In-One-
> Systems, one failure could take down the wh
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:25:24 -0500
Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Leonardo Rodrigues :
>
> > it's VERY common in the software industry to stop supporting old
> > versions, but they simply stay working.
>
> For six months, you've been told to either upgrade or disable signature
> updates.
Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Am 2010-04-16 17:55:16, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Maybe this happened, but I had two calls in the morning about this, for
> maybe five mailing systems which stopped working. Most of them are not
> easily upgradeable. After all, I can't care it the less. But what
Hello Christopher X. Candreva,
Am 2010-04-16 11:08:47, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> What you SHOULD take from this is that you may want to change how your
> milter is set up, so that if clamd dies, unscanned mail is passed rather
> than rejected or temp-failed.
When I read, that entires se
Hello Maurice Lucas - TAOS-IT,
Am 2010-04-16 15:56:55, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I'm on multiple mailinglists I don't read every day but are on a ones
> a week a quick scan.
> And a lot of them are announce lists for all production critical
> software I use.
>
> If I run a ssh service on
2010/4/16 Török Edwin
> Hi,
>
> I just had a chat on #clamav with 2 people having problem with ClamAV 0.96
> on FreeBSD 6.2. (everything was OK on FreeBSD 6.3)
>
> The symptom is that clamscan/clamd never starts, just loops infinitely
> trying to load the DB, --debug shows:
> Libclamav debug: in
Thank you all, thank you for moral support!
I had to install the mail and web server so much, but the compilation was
successful. Few fit the standard debian and everything has been working
for 20 hours.
Interesting statistics:
server:/# grep FOUND /var/log/clamav/clamav.log|tail -n 40
Thu Apr 15
On 04/17/2010 10:14 AM, Sanjay Pothen wrote:
I have installed the calm daemon from the synaptic package manager.but when i use the
command line to scan using the command "calmdscan",
The daemon is called ClamAV daemon (clamd), and the client is called
clamdscan, not calmdscan.
i get error
pl.sent me my password for posting the threads.I was not able to authenticate
my account though i confirmed with my link sent by calm- users.
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
___
I have installed the calm daemon from the synaptic package manager.but when i
use the command line to scan using the command "calmdscan", i get error message
.please help me activate clamdscan.
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.
55 matches
Mail list logo
