[Clamav-users] Submit form treating samples as false positives

2010-03-09 Thread rafa
Hi, When submitting samples they are treated as false positives. Result: This file is not detected by ClamAV. Please update your CVD database before reporting false-positives. If you are using third-party databases/unofficial signatures, please contact the author of the signature. We can onl

Re: [Clamav-users] quick question on freshclam

2010-03-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: > I want to change how I run freshclam on OSX from running as a deamon to > running periodically using launchd. Unfortunately, freshclam's returning of 1 > when no updates were required causes issues with launchd since it thinks > freshclam exited abno

[Clamav-users] quick question on freshclam

2010-03-09 Thread Tom Shaw
I want to change how I run freshclam on OSX from running as a deamon to running periodically using launchd. Unfortunately, freshclam's returning of 1 when no updates were required causes issues with launchd since it thinks freshclam exited abnormally and attempts to respawn. Now, I can easil

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Timothy Legge
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 6:50 PM -0400 3/9/10, Timothy Legge wrote: >> I would prefer to get the file name in the logs but I had to pass >> --fdpass as the option so clamd would scan files that it did not have >> permission to scan. >> >> Should I approach this in a dif

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Timothy Legge
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Timothy Legge wrote: >> The only question now is whether there is a noticable difference in >> speed between clamdscan and clamscan? > > They should scan files at the same speed, but it takes clamscan longer to get

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Timothy Legge wrote: > The only question now is whether there is a noticable difference in > speed between clamdscan and clamscan? They should scan files at the same speed, but it takes clamscan longer to get started since it has to load up the virus definitions. The

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Tom Shaw
At 6:50 PM -0400 3/9/10, Timothy Legge wrote: Hi I am trying to schedule a cron job to scan files and if a virus is noticed to log that via syslog so it can be sent to a remote syslog server. I have successfully done this by using clamd and clamdscan however the logs show: Mar 9 17:45:04 serv

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Timothy Legge
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Timothy Legge wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to schedule a cron job to scan files and if a virus is > noticed to log that via syslog so it can be sent to a remote syslog > server. [snip] > Should I approach this in a different way like using clamscan instead? >  It d

[Clamav-users] clamav syslog and cron

2010-03-09 Thread Timothy Legge
Hi I am trying to schedule a cron job to scan files and if a virus is noticed to log that via syslog so it can be sent to a remote syslog server. I have successfully done this by using clamd and clamdscan however the logs show: Mar 9 17:45:04 server1 clamd[26200]: fd[12]: Eicar-Test-Signature F

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Kris Deugau
Török Edwin wrote: The existing whitelist doesn't pass because amazon.com doesn't have anything preceding it. Try this: X:.+\.amazon\.(at|ca|co\.uk|co\.jp|com|de|fr)([/?].*)?:(.+\.)?amazon\.com([/?].*)?:17- Looks good, thanks! I've put this in daily.wdb on the live servers; is that the offi

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Török Edwin
On 03/09/2010 08:06 PM, Kris Deugau wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> It should already be whitelisted: >> X:.+\.amazon\.(at|ca|co\.uk|co\.jp|com|de|fr)([/?].*)?:.+\.amazon\.com([/?].*)?:17- >> >> X:.+:.+images\.amazon\.com([/?].*)?:17- >> >> What is the domain of the image, and the domain of the href

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Kris Deugau
Török Edwin wrote: It should already be whitelisted: X:.+\.amazon\.(at|ca|co\.uk|co\.jp|com|de|fr)([/?].*)?:.+\.amazon\.com([/?].*)?:17- X:.+:.+images\.amazon\.com([/?].*)?:17- What is the domain of the image, and the domain of the href target? Can you craft a simple example html mail with just

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Rick Macdougall
On 09/03/2010 12:18 PM, Jim Preston wrote: Just a coursoity, did you report the PhishinScanURL problem? No, I didn't get the chance. It was crazy busy around that period and come January I had forgotten all about it. This thread just reminded me. Regards, Rick _

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Jim Preston
Hi, You'll also see the problem with orders from Sears and a few other retailers. I had to disable PhishingScanURLs here starting in early December due to all the false positives. Regards, Rick Hi Rick, Just a coursoity, did you report the PhishinScanURL problem? Thanks, Jim ___

Re: [Clamav-users] Sender and recipient of blocked messages not appearing in logs, only

2010-03-09 Thread Robert S
I have been getting these messages in my logs when a message is detected as a virus: Mar 8 08:44:56 mypc clamav-milter[6112]: Message o27LiRP8029635 from to with subject 'Important notice: Google' message-id 'UNKNOWN' date 'UNKNOWN' infected by Sanesecurity.Junk.22168.UNOFFICIAL Is it possib

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Rick Macdougall
On 09/03/2010 11:52 AM, Kris Deugau wrote: I just received a report from a customer about a legitimate Amazon.ca order confirmation that tripped the Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain code in Clamav (0.95.3 from Debian lenny volatile). I'm not sure what this heuristic test looks for, but af

Re: [Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Török Edwin
On 03/09/2010 06:52 PM, Kris Deugau wrote: > I just received a report from a customer about a legitimate Amazon.ca > order confirmation that tripped the > Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain code in Clamav (0.95.3 from > Debian lenny volatile). > > I'm not sure what this heuristic test looks f

[Clamav-users] Amazon.com order confirmation tripped Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain

2010-03-09 Thread Kris Deugau
I just received a report from a customer about a legitimate Amazon.ca order confirmation that tripped the Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain code in Clamav (0.95.3 from Debian lenny volatile). I'm not sure what this heuristic test looks for, but after inspecting the message source I'm pr