Hello again,
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 James Babcock wrote:
> As I showed in the thread to you on Nov 29, the TWO clam's DO
> produce the same output after a scan of my entire user area.
Inconclusive, I'm afraid. I have here two four-legged animals.
Both have tails. One is a cat. Is the other a cat?
On 2009-12-02 21:47, Vigil, Joe wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-
>> boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Török Edwin
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:49 AM
>> To: ClamAV users ML
>> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-
> boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Török Edwin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:49 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV Memory Usage
>
> On 2009-12-02 20:37, Vigil
On 2009-12-02 20:37, Vigil, Joe wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-
>> boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Török Edwin
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:08 AM
>> To: ClamAV users ML
>> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-
> boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Török Edwin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:08 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV Memory Usage
>
> On 2009-12-02 19:47, Vigil
On 2009-12-02 19:47, Vigil, Joe wrote:
> When I run the ps command on the clamd process id, the VSZ is 4416 and the SZ
> is 5584. The man page on 'ps' doesn't make it clear if the SZ includes the
> VSZ, or if they're separate. Anyway, does this mean that there's a problem
> with my install?
> Th
When I run the ps command on the clamd process id, the VSZ is 4416 and the SZ
is 5584. The man page on 'ps' doesn't make it clear if the SZ includes the VSZ,
or if they're separate. Anyway, does this mean that there's a problem with my
install?
Thanks!
- Joe
> -Original Message-
> Fro
On 2009-12-02 19:14, Vigil, Joe wrote:
> I find this memory usage troubling. We're using version 0.95 of clamd on AIX;
> it uses under 5M of RAM. Since memory is tight with our system, I wouldn't
> want to upgrade if it's going to use that much memory.
>
>
5M? Thats not possible, you must be
I find this memory usage troubling. We're using version 0.95 of clamd on AIX;
it uses under 5M of RAM. Since memory is tight with our system, I wouldn't want
to upgrade if it's going to use that much memory.
- Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailt
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone explain why clamd 0.95.3 might use 190MB of RAM after 5 days
of light usage (few hundred emails)? It is the single biggest process on
my mail servers, and I'm not convinced it's size is reasonably
justifiable. The database files under /var/lib/clamav use abo
Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone explain why clamd 0.95.3 might use 190MB of RAM after 5 days
The figure is "normal". In those 190MB there are likely ~110MB of
database and ~80MB of unused memory which is retained (by either libc or
the kernel) inside the process.
Unfortunately it's not v
Hi there,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Can anyone explain why clamd 0.95.3 might use 190MB of RAM after 5
> days of light usage (few hundred emails)? It is the single biggest
> process on my mail servers, and I'm not convinced it's size is
> reasonably justifiable.
It's perfectly no
Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone explain why clamd 0.95.3 might use 190MB of RAM after 5
> days of light usage (few hundred emails)? It is the single biggest
> process on my mail servers, and I'm not convinced it's size is
> reasonably justifiable. The database files under /var/lib/clamav
13 matches
Mail list logo
