Remember not everyone that uses clamav is not an expert so for
someone that is new to clamav thinks that every file that went
through clamav would be scanned for malware would be incorrect and
they have a possibility of opening an infected file. I think a
message or warning that a file that was
On 9/19/08, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > On 9/19/08, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> fchan wrote:
> >> > I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but
> >> > to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no erro
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> On 9/19/08, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> fchan wrote:
>> > I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but
>> > to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no error message for file
>> > that are too large to notify the admin so th
On 9/19/08, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fchan wrote:
> > I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but
> > to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no error message for file
> > that are too large to notify the admin so they can adjust clamd.conf
> > or o
fchan wrote:
> I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but
> to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no error message for file
> that are too large to notify the admin so they can adjust clamd.conf
> or other action. Right now this infected file passes through like if
I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but
to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no error message for file
that are too large to notify the admin so they can adjust clamd.conf
or other action. Right now this infected file passes through like if
it was not infected w
I have RedHat ES 5.1 and I have support with
RedHat so I have logged a trouble ticket for this
issue and this is their latest reply:
16-SEP-2008 02:03:47Shailendra Suhas Bandodkar
Greetings,
Thanks for the update.
I consulted the security response team. They say
that they have reviewed t
Check if /tmp/clamd.socket is there. If so remove
it before you start clamd which can hinder clamd
from starting.
I hope this helps.
Frank
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-patched-p8
ClamAV 0.94 from ports
Clamd does not work. When starting, i get this in logs:
However, clamd is not running and
>> Does clamav have a mechanism to find out a file is an archive without
>> relying on its extension? For example does it know it has to unzip a
>> zipped file even if its extension was changed to a random one
>> different than .zip ?
>
> ClamAV doesn't rely on file extensions. It uses magic number
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:46:40 -0500
"Alejandro Pedraza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does clamav have a mechanism to find out a file is an archive without
> relying on its extension? For example does it know it has to unzip a
> zipped file even if its extension was changed to a random one
Hi,
Does clamav have a mechanism to find out a file is an archive without
relying on its extension? For example does it know it has to unzip a
zipped file even if its extension was changed to a random one
different than .zip ?
Thanks,
Alejandro
___
Help
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:51:52 -0300
"Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right ! This is detect now, but the correct behavior would not be
> display a error message like "File too big, not scanned!" ??
Some discussions on this topic:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080129.163022
On 9/19/08, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:14:29 -0300
> "Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bug 1195 opened !
>
> Please see my comment, clamscan --max-filesize=50M detects the file
Right ! This is detect now, but the correct behavior would
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:14:29 -0300
"Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug 1195 opened !
Please see my comment, clamscan --max-filesize=50M detects the file
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
Vladimir wrote:
> A lot of lines like
> #0 0x28141268 in _pthread_sigmask (how=3, set=0xbfbfeb50, oset=0x0)
> at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c:60
> #1 0x281a5a1a in sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
>
Did you change the PTHREAD_LIBS in the ports Makefile at all? I
unfortu
On 9/19/08, Arnaud Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008 01:54, Alexandre Biancalana a écrit :
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm experiencing a very strange situation and need some help. I have
> > some files infected by W32.Parite.B in my linux file server, bu
On 9/19/08, Török Edwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-19 02:54, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm experiencing a very strange situation and need some help. I have
> > some files infected by W32.Parite.B in my linux file server, but the
> > clamav on the file serve
ldconfig: yes I remembered that afterwards.
;-)
clamav 0.94 plus patch is running on SuSE 10.3 ok now for the last 14 days.
Which announcement do you mean?
I do not read this mailing list regularly...
I did not find anything on the website.
For the future one suggestion:
can you please put things
Hello,
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008 01:54, Alexandre Biancalana a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> I'm experiencing a very strange situation and need some help. I have
> some files infected by W32.Parite.B in my linux file server, but the
> clamav on the file server does not detect the virus, so I copied
On 2008-09-19 02:54, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm experiencing a very strange situation and need some help. I have
> some files infected by W32.Parite.B in my linux file server, but the
> clamav on the file server does not detect the virus, so I copied the
> file to my OS X 10, r
20 matches
Mail list logo
