On 9/19/08, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fchan wrote: > > I read your links and I understand possible DoS and other issues but > > to repeat Alexandre's idea, why is there no error message for file > > that are too large to notify the admin so they can adjust clamd.conf > > or other action. Right now this infected file passes through like if > > it was not infected which would be dangerous under certain conditions. > > IMHO this file shouldn't pass through clamav without any error message. > > > > Frank > > > What would the error message say? There was no error in my view. The > file was larger than what the OP was willing to test so it was not > tested (if I understand it correctly). As such it is accepted at risk. > It is the OP's job to decide what else to do with files that are > accepted at risk. That may require yet another milter or other process > spawned by procmail, for example.
Could not be an error message, just a warning, a informative message, saying that the file was not scanned and not that the file is clean.... In this case I'm using clamav on a file server to scan user files not emails... Att, _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
