Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav know virus count reduced.

2008-07-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:46:28 -0700 > Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Perhaps the solution is to report only true failures and not intermediate >> failures >> while on the path to success. > > the latest version of freshclam with --no-warnings should do it >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav know virus count reduced.

2008-07-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:46:28 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps the solution is to report only true failures and not intermediate > failures > while on the path to success. the latest version of freshclam with --no-warnings should do it -- oo. Tomasz

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav know virus count reduced.

2008-07-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
G.W. Haywood wrote: > > But it seems to me that there's hardly a week goes by without someone > posting to the list a new and interesting way in which his freshclam- > driven update has failed. > > Take today, for example. I haven't have a freshclam failure yet but I've had errors reported. Fr

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav know virus count reduced.

2008-07-02 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, > > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync > > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing > > > > about with HTTP? > > > > > > The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of fre

Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning IM

2008-07-02 Thread Babu N
Should the following command work ? iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i -p tcp --dport -j DNAT --to : Btw, does squidguard support the ability to parse IM protocol ? Thanks, Babu On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Lu