Joe Sloan wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Ben wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:37 AM, taj home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please dont email me.
>>> I'm not emailing you.
>> I think he's suggesting that he'd prefer you not mail him because of
>> your idiot policy on outgoing virus scann
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Ben wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:37 AM, taj home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> please dont email me.
>> I'm not emailing you.
>
> I think he's suggesting that he'd prefer you not mail him because of
> your idiot policy on outgoing virus scanning.
Come now, that's
Ben wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:37 AM, taj home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> please dont email me.
>
> I'm not emailing you.
I think he's suggesting that he'd prefer you not mail him because of
your idiot policy on outgoing virus scanning. I agree with him. I'm sure
I'm not the only one
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:37 AM, taj home <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please dont email me.
I'm not emailing you.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
please dont email me.
On 3/30/08, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Randal Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ben wrote:...
> > > Virus scanning is not even that important on this server, my users
> > > would never be sending vir
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 23 meg is not very large. Many versions ago it would grow to half a gig
> at which time my watchdog would restart it.
How would one implement that?
Or is that just a matter of googling "watchdog" ?
I've never used one,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Randal Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ben wrote:...
> > Virus scanning is not even that important on this server, my users
> > would never be sending viruses,
> This is a dangerous assumption.
> Conceivably, your users would n
I needed to use sigtool to extract and use the signatures from the database.
It worked. Thanks to all of you for your quick help.
--
Fawaz
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Erik P. Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/03/08 21:22, Syed Fawaz Hasan wrote:
> > Thanks. I did that and the instal
On 29/03/08 21:22, Syed Fawaz Hasan wrote:
> Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
> However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
> can I run clamav and sigtool?
Do "locate clamdoc.pdf" and when found read it. You find clamav in both
/usr/
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Syed Fawaz Hasan wrote:
>> Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
>> However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
>> can I run clamav and sigtool?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
Forgot to add:
When I run this command:
# rpm -qa |
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Syed Fawaz Hasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
> However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
> can I run clamav and sigtool?
# which clamscan
If that doesn't work:
#
Syed Fawaz Hasan wrote:
> Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
> However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
> can I run clamav and sigtool?
>
> Thanks.
The file names to look for:
clamd
clamdscan
clamscan
freshclam
sigtool
clamconf
cl
Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
can I run clamav and sigtool?
Thanks.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Erik P. Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/03/08 01:27, Syed Fawaz Hasan wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ben wrote:...
>
> Virus scanning is not even that important on this server, my users
> would never be sending viruses,
.
.
.
This is a dangerous assumption.
Conceivably, your users would never /intentionally/ send viruses
Ben wrote:
> I run clamd on a CentOS server, with freshclam, and clamsmtpd to scan mail.
> And I use it interfacing with postfix.
> However, just clamd alone uses 23 Megabytes when idle!
>
That is approximately what I see with RHEL4 and Solaris 9. For Solaris 8
and 10 on a fresh start it is abou
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run clamd on a CentOS server, with freshclam, and clamsmtpd to scan mail.
> And I use it interfacing with postfix.
> However, just clamd alone uses 23 Megabytes when idle!
23 MB is huge? What are you running it on, a Commodore 6
I run clamd on a CentOS server, with freshclam, and clamsmtpd to scan mail.
And I use it interfacing with postfix.
However, just clamd alone uses 23 Megabytes when idle!
Can someone post configuration options to limit or lower memory
footstamp of clamav all around?
I'm looking for concrete functio
Hello Dennis,
> > there a lot of users still running old ClamAV versions that do not
> > support incremental updates (especially in US, as it seems).
> > The size of daily.cvd is almost 2MB, and this is hurting some mirrors.
> >
> > We are going to release a main.cvd update in the first half of A
18 matches
Mail list logo
